Some countries allow old people to work to any age that they want. Do the advantages outweigh the disadvantages?
In day and age, the elder people regardless of any age are permitted to go on working if they want is considered a controversial issue and become popular in some parts of the world. However, given the fact that every coin has its two sides and this issue is not exception. In my perspective, I side with the aspects that the emerging trend is more disadvantages than advantages.
On the one hand, there are several reasons why older citizens are allowed to work in aby age, which would bring some effects for the society. Older labors are deemed as rich experience and profession staff in a company, they could make an important contribute to projects’ smooth operation and play an fundamental role in the increase profits of companies or organizations. Moreover, when an old person does a job, there are more valuable chance to have a stable income, more precisely they can
be able to make ends meet for their own lives. By doing so, the aged individuals may be less dependent on their own children, they can afford something that they satisfactorily want, even under certain circumstances, old ones also have the capacity of supporting their children and relatives in terms of finance.
On the other hand, economically, in general, there has been a surge in advanced technology and transformation in several aspects of sectors. It is expected that the works have currently require labor forces that have linguistic abilities, creativity, the capacity of technology and particularly a quick adaption and integration to new changes and environment. All of aforementioned things are noticeably found in younger labors. If the elder people are lengthened the retired span, actually younger ones who have more innovative and high-tech ideas may not have global chances to demonstrate their abilities and create valuable for their community. Furthermore, the trend may lead the development of unemployment rate that have adverse impacts on a nation’s economy and the stable society.
In conclusion, the limitless working age of old individuals is somehow not beneficial to the development of community. Hence, a country should seriously consider to balance the number of labor force in diverse aged- group and adjust appropriate retirement age.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 300, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'a' instead of 'an' if the following word doesn't start with a vowel sound, e.g. 'a sentence', 'a university'
Suggestion: a
... to projects’ smooth operation and play an fundamental role in the increase profit...
^^
Line 2, column 495, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...a stable income, more precisely they can be able to make ends meet for their own ...
^^^
Line 3, column 314, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...dren and relatives in terms of finance. On the other hand, economically, in gene...
^^^^
Line 4, column 187, Rule ID: HAVE_PART_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Possible agreement error -- use past participle here: 'required'.
Suggestion: required
... expected that the works have currently require labor forces that have linguistic abili...
^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 791, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ation’s economy and the stable society. In conclusion, the limitless working age...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, also, but, furthermore, hence, however, if, may, moreover, so, then, in conclusion, in general, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 10.4138276553 144% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 24.0651302605 87% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 41.998997996 100% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 8.3376753507 156% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1888.0 1615.20841683 117% => OK
No of words: 364.0 315.596192385 115% => OK
Chars per words: 5.18681318681 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.36792674256 4.20363070211 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.00766339967 2.80592935109 107% => OK
Unique words: 216.0 176.041082164 123% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.593406593407 0.561755894193 106% => OK
syllable_count: 616.5 506.74238477 122% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 6.0 2.52805611222 237% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 26.0 20.2975951904 128% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 55.6217179724 49.4020404114 113% => OK
Chars per sentence: 134.857142857 106.682146367 126% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.0 20.7667163134 125% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.78571428571 7.06120827912 124% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.01903807615 100% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.256333188499 0.244688304435 105% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0736221486976 0.084324248473 87% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0842533401302 0.0667982634062 126% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.134541570671 0.151304729494 89% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0638601878283 0.056905535591 112% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.0 13.0946893788 122% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 36.63 50.2224549098 73% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.6 11.3001002004 129% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.12 12.4159519038 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.39 8.58950901804 109% => OK
difficult_words: 103.0 78.4519038076 131% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.1190380762 123% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.