Some professionals earn a handsome amount of money per month while others make very little. Many people believe that it is favorable for the country but others are of the opinion that there should be a limit on the amount of salary one can take from workplace. If government exercises control over the monetary incentives availed by every individual, it promotes equality but takes away personal liberty, making it unfair to those who work harder than others.
If maximum wages are defined, it is easier to build an economy based on equality. In this economic model, the pay gap is negligible and it leads to elimination of class system in the society. Also, the concept of rich and poor is minimal and less privileged fractions of society do not become a victim of unequal distribution of wealth.This also results in formation of a balanced society, devoid of resentment and prejudices. For example, in Scandinavian countries, the maximum salary limit is 2500 dollars per month so, no one makes extraordinary amount of money at the end of month. Research shows that class system is non-existent in these countries and people do not suffer from inferiority complexes. Moreover, ensuring controlled earning also discourages materialism in the country and creates empathy among people.
On the other hand, those who earn considerably high salaries at the end of the month often have professional degrees, which they have bagged after years of academic struggles. They also work longer hours and their jobs require high level of expertise. So, paying them equal to those who are less qualified or have easy work hours is unfair to these high functioning individuals. Furthermore, everyone has a right to make a living according to the amount of work they put in so, limiting salaries proves to be an attack on their personal liberties. In US, for instance, a doctor works sixteen hours a day while for a plumber, the mandatory work time limit is only eight hours. So, if both get paid with negligible pay gap, it would be significantly unfair to a doctor, who has studied for many years to gain this level of expertise and works for double amount of time.
To conclude, putting a limit on earning of wealth makes an economically equal society but it comes at the cost of basic rights like liberty to earn. Therefore, everyone should be allowed to enjoy salary according to his academic abilities and job requirements because generating equality by sacrificing individual rights is utter discrimination.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 337, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: This
...ictim of unequal distribution of wealth.This also results in formation of a balanced...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, furthermore, if, moreover, so, therefore, while, for example, for instance, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 13.1623246493 122% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 10.4138276553 125% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 26.0 24.0651302605 108% => OK
Preposition: 59.0 41.998997996 140% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2086.0 1615.20841683 129% => OK
No of words: 417.0 315.596192385 132% => OK
Chars per words: 5.00239808153 5.12529762239 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.5189133491 4.20363070211 108% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.81863448408 2.80592935109 100% => OK
Unique words: 232.0 176.041082164 132% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.556354916067 0.561755894193 99% => OK
syllable_count: 680.4 506.74238477 134% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 20.2975951904 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 44.0506157438 49.4020404114 89% => OK
Chars per sentence: 122.705882353 106.682146367 115% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.5294117647 20.7667163134 118% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.11764705882 7.06120827912 87% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.235832399798 0.244688304435 96% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0712471084335 0.084324248473 84% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0684966279528 0.0667982634062 103% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.144794763909 0.151304729494 96% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0764544128245 0.056905535591 134% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.4 13.0946893788 110% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 47.12 50.2224549098 94% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.02 12.4159519038 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.03 8.58950901804 105% => OK
difficult_words: 111.0 78.4519038076 141% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.1190380762 115% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.