In some countries, more and more people are becoming interested in finding out about the history of the house or building they live in.
What are the reasons for this?
How can people research this?
History overall has always been an intriguing thing to many people, including but not limited to houses or buildings. In fact, many countries, especially in Asia, people contentiously consider finding a house that may be suitable for them and meet all their requirements of yin and yang harmonization. Hench, before reaching to acquiescence of deciding a house to live, assembling upon all of the information pertaining to the houses deems crucial to the people. Recently, some articles or journals are reporting this tendency and doing fact-checking research for readers.
When settling in a new residential area, citizens may be curious about the history of the house or places surrounding the area. There are a score of inquiries due to the fact that residents with high belief in the scope of religion, any details in the house are connected to intangible entities that normal people can not see or touch. People will oversee these things whether they are possessed or not and decline if it happens. In these days, real-estate prices are climbing even higher in each period, notwithstanding this research can take them a month or a year to proceed, if the house could satisfy their criteria with no malpractices or undesiring faults, the family might come to negotiation with the former owners or real-estate brokers and sign the contract.
With all consideration and observation, the buyers might commence a necessary research about the living place. Taking an Asian family as an example, in Asian culture, prior to purchasing a house, they will ask the neighborhoods in that area to look up for information related to that house. Some brief questions may be asked like: How many former owners of the house, why did they sell it or is there any defect of the house that urges the owner to sell it? These questions may take many days of researching, but when it comes to a family wanting to have a permanent place to live in, they will not hesitate to proceed it
In conclusion, I assume that each person among us has distinctive perspectives on finding the history of the place they are going to live and settle. Moreover, researching information related to it is taking a substantial role in searching their habitual living place and seems to be a pivotal step in sequence. With all my accession, I believe people have made out their decision on looking for information and history about the living place with persistence.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 170, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ny countries, especially in Asia, people contentiously consider finding a house t...
^^^
Line 1, column 389, Rule ID: ALL_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'all the'.
Suggestion: all the
...ciding a house to live, assembling upon all of the information pertaining to the houses de...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 67, Rule ID: A_UNCOUNTABLE[3]
Message: Uncountable nouns are usually not used with an indefinite article. Use simply 'necessary research'.
Suggestion: necessary research
... observation, the buyers might commence a necessary research about the living place. Taking an Asian...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 622, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...in, they will not hesitate to proceed it In conclusion, I assume that each person...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, look, may, moreover, so, in conclusion, in fact
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 7.85571142285 153% => OK
Conjunction : 20.0 10.4138276553 192% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 33.0 24.0651302605 137% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 61.0 41.998997996 145% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.3376753507 144% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2031.0 1615.20841683 126% => OK
No of words: 409.0 315.596192385 130% => OK
Chars per words: 4.96577017115 5.12529762239 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.49708221141 4.20363070211 107% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.86709821083 2.80592935109 102% => OK
Unique words: 216.0 176.041082164 123% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.528117359413 0.561755894193 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 635.4 506.74238477 125% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.76152304609 168% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 29.0 20.2975951904 143% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 70.8775892159 49.4020404114 143% => OK
Chars per sentence: 145.071428571 106.682146367 136% => OK
Words per sentence: 29.2142857143 20.7667163134 141% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.0 7.06120827912 57% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.01903807615 80% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 3.4128256513 176% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.255162443739 0.244688304435 104% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0870417106622 0.084324248473 103% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0336081235206 0.0667982634062 50% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.155544796746 0.151304729494 103% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0300977505051 0.056905535591 53% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.6 13.0946893788 127% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.04 50.2224549098 84% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.6 11.3001002004 129% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.14 12.4159519038 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.36 8.58950901804 109% => OK
difficult_words: 111.0 78.4519038076 141% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.6 10.1190380762 134% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.