In some countries, the number of people who visit art galleries is declining. What are the reasons for this? How can we solve this problem?
It is being observed that in several nations, the rooms exhibiting art forms are encountering low visitors. Evolution of new methods of entertainment and knowledge is the crucial factor responsible for this, however, it can be solved by motivating audience through various actions.
Art galleries display various forms of paintings which now seemed to be old fashioned due to advancement in ways of enjoyment. Most of the population especially youngsters want to spend time by gaining experiences in an amused way which boring still pictures does not provide but internet did, through motion pictures. Moreover, the high cost of entry might be the possible reason for less gathering. According to a survey conducted by Belgium’s ‘State of Art Studio’ 73% of subjects marked art galleries as uninteresting and found YouTube more attractive way of learning.
The number of tourists to glorified art galleries can be raised by equipping them with ultra-modern technology and providing attractive amenities to people. Firstly, optimum authorities should release funds for the renovation of palaces. Secondly, galleries are obliged to add more styles of art such as sand art, live performances by great artists. Finally, raising awareness about these magnificent pieces of arts and lowering the ticket price could assist in positive manner. To evident my point of view, a report published by The National Gallery, London states that adding up innovative art genres and offering audio-video experience to visitors elevated their number.
In view of arguments outlined above one can conclude that number of travelers to marvelous art galleries reduced with the passage of time as most of the demonstration over there were now outdated, shifting people towards latest ways of recreation but figure can upsurge by delivering thrilling events.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 214, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[2]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: 'towards the latest'.
Suggestion: towards the latest
...here were now outdated, shifting people towards latest ways of recreation but figure can upsur...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, finally, first, firstly, however, if, moreover, second, secondly, so, still, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 10.0 24.0651302605 42% => OK
Preposition: 49.0 41.998997996 117% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1566.0 1615.20841683 97% => OK
No of words: 285.0 315.596192385 90% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.49473684211 5.12529762239 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.10876417139 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.92982666246 2.80592935109 104% => OK
Unique words: 193.0 176.041082164 110% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.677192982456 0.561755894193 121% => OK
syllable_count: 483.3 506.74238477 95% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 58.9851087611 49.4020404114 119% => OK
Chars per sentence: 130.5 106.682146367 122% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.75 20.7667163134 114% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.41666666667 7.06120827912 105% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.216140458143 0.244688304435 88% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0698817343224 0.084324248473 83% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0417799453687 0.0667982634062 63% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.122296960357 0.151304729494 81% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0187215580076 0.056905535591 33% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.3 13.0946893788 124% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 39.67 50.2224549098 79% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 11.3001002004 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.86 12.4159519038 120% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.93 8.58950901804 127% => OK
difficult_words: 111.0 78.4519038076 141% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.