It is stated that owning a home plays a significant role in people's lives in several nations. This is plausible for several underlining reasons, but in my opinion, this situation has more drawbacks than advantages.
On the one hand, there are solid arguments in favor of the claim that home ownership is important in some countries. The main explanation for this is that residents of those nations might feel comfortable in their homes. Since they are considered to be the property of the public, these homes are free to be renovated and built whatever their owners see fit without being subject to any rules or restrictions. As a result, people may be able to leave their privacy and avoid interruptions from the next-door neighbors. Also, residing in one's own home might help one avoid numerous risks like electrical issues and fires.
The repercussions of financial stress and a shortage of habitable land, however, can have a significant impact on people's lives. First of all, people who want to own homes may need to set aside money for a future home, which requires them to work very hard and juggle a busy schedule, which can make them feel stressed and worsen their physical and mental health because they don't get enough downtime. Furthermore, this circumstance may result in a shortage of living land. It illustrates how the world's population has grown and how the scarcity of land has drawn attention from the general public.
In conclusion, it makes sense that people in some nations prefer owning their own home than renting one. Unfortunately, this situation might have a negative impact on people's life.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 377, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
...physical and mental health because they dont get enough downtime. Furthermore, this ...
^^^^
Line 5, column 498, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'worlds'' or 'world's'?
Suggestion: worlds'; world's
... of living land. It illustrates how the worlds population has grown and how the scarci...
^^^^^^
Line 5, column 584, Rule ID: GENERAL_XX[1]
Message: Use simply 'public'.
Suggestion: public
...ty of land has drawn attention from the general public. In conclusion, it makes sense that ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, furthermore, however, if, may, so, in conclusion, as a result, first of all, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 24.0 24.0651302605 100% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 41.998997996 79% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1358.0 1615.20841683 84% => OK
No of words: 272.0 315.596192385 86% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.99264705882 5.12529762239 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.06108636974 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.70420344334 2.80592935109 96% => OK
Unique words: 167.0 176.041082164 95% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.613970588235 0.561755894193 109% => OK
syllable_count: 423.0 506.74238477 83% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 51.0556025938 49.4020404114 103% => OK
Chars per sentence: 104.461538462 106.682146367 98% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.9230769231 20.7667163134 101% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.30769230769 7.06120827912 118% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.35367111049 0.244688304435 145% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.120857563694 0.084324248473 143% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0767025801221 0.0667982634062 115% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.234388332881 0.151304729494 155% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0971082627448 0.056905535591 171% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.5 13.0946893788 95% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 50.2224549098 102% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.66 12.4159519038 94% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.87 8.58950901804 103% => OK
difficult_words: 73.0 78.4519038076 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.