It is sometimes argued that people in many countries of the world owning a house preferable than rental. In my opinion, it has positve and negative situation.
There are several reasons why has negative situation of renting accommodation. Firstly, people have not got enough room in their home or house and leads more negative situation for example, when they have not sufficient money for own family and they decided to rent other accommodation. Consequently, it can lead to conflict with own parentage. Finally, owning a house preferable than renting.
One the other hand, owning a home rather than renting one is very important for people and it has an advantages. Many people can help with excess home to other people when they have not got home and they want to rent accommodation. Furthermore, for the rent will benefit the recipient. Another owned home does not necessarily need to be paid every month, which in the case of a rented one, a tenant is compelled to pay the monthly rent. Moreover, when the agreement gets over, it is in the hands of an owner whether to allow the renters to say for another period or to make them leave the property. Therefore, in order not to be dependent on the landlord's decision, it is better to be one's own decision maker.
In conclusion, in a number of countries, residents prefer owning a home to renting one. I am inclined to believe that this trend is way more advantageous since it frees the dweller from ceaseless payments as well as from unexpectedly being forced to hadle the keys to the owner.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 99, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[1]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'an advantage' or simply 'advantages'?
Suggestion: an advantage; advantages
...is very important for people and it has an advantages. Many people can help with excess home ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
consequently, finally, first, firstly, furthermore, moreover, so, therefore, well, for example, in conclusion, as well as, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 24.0651302605 75% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 41.998997996 83% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1285.0 1615.20841683 80% => OK
No of words: 269.0 315.596192385 85% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.77695167286 5.12529762239 93% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.0498419064 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.72856882331 2.80592935109 97% => OK
Unique words: 149.0 176.041082164 85% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.553903345725 0.561755894193 99% => OK
syllable_count: 413.1 506.74238477 82% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 49.8624638994 49.4020404114 101% => OK
Chars per sentence: 91.7857142857 106.682146367 86% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.2142857143 20.7667163134 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.71428571429 7.06120827912 138% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.387570236288 0.244688304435 158% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.126781979488 0.084324248473 150% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0841512066485 0.0667982634062 126% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.200646657856 0.151304729494 133% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0681262271034 0.056905535591 120% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.7 13.0946893788 82% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 60.65 50.2224549098 121% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 11.3001002004 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.44 12.4159519038 84% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.22 8.58950901804 96% => OK
difficult_words: 62.0 78.4519038076 79% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 9.78957915832 72% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.