The youth are full of energy. Nowadays, the young bring many innovations in various spheres of life. However, some countries believe that older people are more valuable, whereas others think young should have emphasis. Although the youth contribute less, I strongly agree that they should be involved more.
On the one hand, old age people have some essential features that young people lack. The old have developed and obtained various skills and knowledge over their life. For instance, with the help of the obtained experience they are able to assess the accomplished job. Thus, they are more efficient than their younger counterparts, which makes their contribution more valuable. Moreover, they know what changes should be in order to improve some aspects of life in their country.
On the other hand, the young generation always come up with fresh ideas and are more energetic to do various tasks. For example, most innovations that were applied to different fields were invented by the youth. As a result, they are more involved in the development of their country. Additionally, they might obtain multiple benefits from this.
In conclusion, the old generation have far more knowledge that makes their contribution to a country valuable, whereas most significant changes were made by the young people. Nevertheless, I strongly support the idea of giving more emphasis to the young due to their helpful aid to their country.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, if, moreover, nevertheless, so, thus, whereas, for example, for instance, in conclusion, as a result, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 10.4138276553 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 22.0 24.0651302605 91% => OK
Preposition: 28.0 41.998997996 67% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1212.0 1615.20841683 75% => OK
No of words: 231.0 315.596192385 73% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.24675324675 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.89854898053 4.20363070211 93% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.62933473965 2.80592935109 94% => OK
Unique words: 127.0 176.041082164 72% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.549783549784 0.561755894193 98% => OK
syllable_count: 365.4 506.74238477 72% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 20.2975951904 74% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 31.7688876453 49.4020404114 64% => OK
Chars per sentence: 80.8 106.682146367 76% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.4 20.7667163134 74% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.86666666667 7.06120827912 126% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.133572567172 0.244688304435 55% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0508323511996 0.084324248473 60% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0429237349108 0.0667982634062 64% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0897686366357 0.151304729494 59% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0248700031125 0.056905535591 44% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.0 13.0946893788 84% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 56.25 50.2224549098 112% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 11.3001002004 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.87 12.4159519038 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.0 8.58950901804 93% => OK
difficult_words: 53.0 78.4519038076 68% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 5.5 9.78957915832 56% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.1190380762 79% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.7795591182 74% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Minimum 250 words wanted.
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.