Some organisations believe that their employees should dress smartly. Others value quality of work above appearance.
Discuss both these views and give your own opinion.
There is a controversially-held view among companies whether employees’ appearances should be taken precedence over their performances at work. Although there are beneficial factors for workers to dress well, I am of the opinion that their working efficiencies are far more prioritized.
On the one hand, it is no doubt true that staffs represent a public image of the company they work for. This means that corporations can be judged on their professionalism as well as their respect to customers through their staff members, which undoubtedly acts as a stimulus for workers to wear appropriately at the workplace. For instance, in some corporates that require exceptional cleanliness and sanitary conditions like hospitals, it is surely unacceptable if doctors wearing the same clothes that they wear to clubs in lieu of freshly laundered scrubs when taking part in surgeries.
However, the clothing that a firm’s staffs dress by no means the only factor that matters to the growth of the company. Further and more importantly, quality of employees’ works acts as a stimulus to establish the firm’s expansion. Recent research indicated that companies correlating with the creation and artistic progressions that have facilitated their workers to dress comfortably experience much more effective in job performances than those who set strict regulations on office clothing. It would seem that the comfier their outfits give, the more concentrated they make during working hours, which considerably acts as a contributor to the proliferation of the quality of works.
In conclusion, it appears that employees should be evaluated in their labor productivity as long as their appearance is appropriate with the company’s regulations as well as not against moral and ethical codes.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-07-25 | linh allie | 89 | view |
| 2024-07-25 | linh allie | 84 | view |
| 2023-07-29 | maria ayoub | 78 | view |
| 2023-07-27 | dolle123 | 56 | view |
| 2023-04-11 | johnlark1908 | 56 | view |
- Richer countries often give money to poorer countries but it does not solve poverty Therefore developed countries should give other types of help to poor countries rather than financial aid To what extend do you agree or disagree 89
- Internet technology means people do not need to travel to foreign countries to understand how others live To what extend do you agree or disagree 89
- In many cities the use of video cameras in public places is becoming more popular but some people are against these measures Do the benefits of CCTV outweigh its drawbacks 78
- More and more people are no longer read newspaper or watch TV programs to get news They get news from about the world through the internet Is this a positive or negative development 84
- Many women are choosing to have children later in life Why is this Do the advantages outweigh the disadvantages 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 592, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...d scrubs when taking part in surgeries. However, the clothing that a firm’s staf...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, if, so, well, for instance, in conclusion, no doubt, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 10.4138276553 38% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 15.0 7.30460921844 205% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 30.0 24.0651302605 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 35.0 41.998997996 83% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1521.0 1615.20841683 94% => OK
No of words: 277.0 315.596192385 88% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.49097472924 5.12529762239 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.07962216107 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.24926594028 2.80592935109 116% => OK
Unique words: 168.0 176.041082164 95% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.606498194946 0.561755894193 108% => OK
syllable_count: 450.9 506.74238477 89% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 16.0721442886 62% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 27.0 20.2975951904 133% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 57.1737702098 49.4020404114 116% => OK
Chars per sentence: 152.1 106.682146367 143% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.7 20.7667163134 133% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.7 7.06120827912 109% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.20958438726 0.244688304435 86% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0865256485641 0.084324248473 103% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0543504802172 0.0667982634062 81% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.140429076351 0.151304729494 93% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0573214155559 0.056905535591 101% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.3 13.0946893788 140% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.07 50.2224549098 88% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 11.3001002004 122% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.86 12.4159519038 120% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.59 8.58950901804 112% => OK
difficult_words: 81.0 78.4519038076 103% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 9.78957915832 153% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 10.1190380762 126% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.7795591182 139% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.