Everywhere presented billboards, cookies used by web-browsers or commercial adverts in newspapers or TV become daily routine of our society. While some believe that advertisement is costly and affect the final product price or might mislead individuals to purchase unwanted product, I agree with those who feel that advertisement improves public's awareness of development as well as increasing sales.
On the one hand, it could be argued that advertisements is costly and owning to this fact might lead to raising of a final price of many products. Undoubtedly promoting, for instance, new iPhone, on Time Square is highly costly, therefore, retailer has to reflect costs for this in product price. However, if product is not promoted, its sales would be more likely lower and the final product price might also fluctuate due to this. Also, offenders of advertisement argue that everywhere seem adverts might mislead members of the public to purchase unwanted or non-needed products or services. For instance, subliminal advertisement in past, before it was banned by regulation authorities, made fairly high amount of people to purchase products or services they did not need.
However, in my opinion, I believe that there are many reasons why advertisement helps us. Firstly, not only as mentioned above, advertisement makes people aware of new technologies, but also improve sales, therefore, as a result improve gross domestic product. Secondly, development of technology helps modern society in many ways to improve the quality of living. With wide range of products on global market, some individuals might be confused and purchase product, which in many cases might not be suitable to their needs. Take a SKODA car for example. Skoda auto in their commercial promote new model as a most suitable car for cyclist, due to its futures to carry bikes not only on the roof, but also inside the car. Model have been tested in Australia with well known landscapes, therefore, might boost a trust of Australians to purchase this car and satisfied their needs. Without advertisement, some individuals might purchased a car not suiting their needs. However, the most compelling argument is simply awareness. Advertisement on social media channels as well as newspaper and TV have been found as the best working way how to aware members of society about general or specific changes in daily living. Undoubtedly wide-spreading these important informations from authorities boost general awareness. For instance, skin cancer in Australia. During summer, every TV channels giving information of necessity of using sun cream every day when exposed to the sun to prevent serious consequences.
In short, although advertisement might raise a final price of some products as well as cause unwanted purchases. Therefore, on balance, I believe that advertisement has a positive and informative impact to our society.
- The diagram shows the process of either recycling plastic items to produce goods or trash into dust bins to fill land 42
- The table below gives information on consumer spending on different items in five different countries in 2002 89
- The use of mobile phone is as antisocial as smoking. Smoking is banned in certain places so mobile phone should be banned like smoking. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 78
- Some people believe that advertisement is useful and informative Others think it is false and only helps to raise prices Discuss both views and give your opinion 77
- The graph below gives information about international tourist arrivals in five countries. 56
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 634, Rule ID: IN_PAST[1]
Message: Did you mean: 'in the past'?
Suggestion: in the past
... For instance, subliminal advertisement in past, before it was banned by regulation aut...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, however, if, second, secondly, so, therefore, well, while, as to, for example, for instance, in short, as a result, as well as, in many cases, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 7.85571142285 153% => OK
Conjunction : 16.0 10.4138276553 154% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 28.0 24.0651302605 116% => OK
Preposition: 62.0 41.998997996 148% => OK
Nominalization: 19.0 8.3376753507 228% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2455.0 1615.20841683 152% => OK
No of words: 458.0 315.596192385 145% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.36026200873 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.62611441266 4.20363070211 110% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.97804508072 2.80592935109 106% => OK
Unique words: 242.0 176.041082164 137% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.528384279476 0.561755894193 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 779.4 506.74238477 154% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 2.10420841683 238% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 9.0 4.76152304609 189% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 22.0 16.0721442886 137% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 51.8970094204 49.4020404114 105% => OK
Chars per sentence: 111.590909091 106.682146367 105% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.8181818182 20.7667163134 100% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.31818181818 7.06120827912 118% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 8.67935871743 150% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.129749932124 0.244688304435 53% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0411544225205 0.084324248473 49% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0433320699774 0.0667982634062 65% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0950933001785 0.151304729494 63% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0310577869335 0.056905535591 55% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.2 13.0946893788 108% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.72 50.2224549098 85% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.81 12.4159519038 111% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.11 8.58950901804 106% => OK
difficult_words: 130.0 78.4519038076 166% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 9.78957915832 148% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.7795591182 139% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.