In contemporary times, traffic congestion is not only a burden but also a growing concern in every city all around the world. Therefore, some cities explore an alternative way of transportation system such as bicycles to reduce the pressure of vehicles on the road. Some people support this idea and others have a dissenting comment. In the following paragraphs, both views’ advantages and disadvantages will be discussed.
On the one hand, firstly, health advantages, in the city people do not have enough time to do exercise regularly, so cycling is a better medium of physical activity by which people can keep their body fit. Moreover, it can reduce traffic jams and suffer from people. For example, many European countries such as the Netherland government encourage people to use cycles in the city by advertising the health and environmental benefits and people also use these. Secondly, environmental benefits, if people use bicycle the less car will run in the road, as a result, the amount of pollution will decrease and fossil energy will be saved. In the long run, people will not suffer from serious environmental issues. But it has some limitations such as limiting the distance, people can not travel a long distance through cycling and not as fast as cars.
On the other hand, in recent times life goes so fastly by using motor vehicles people can travel a long distance within the shortest amount of time and comfortably. As a consequence, they can give more concentration and in their workplace. Though it can give us flexibility and comfort, it has several issues such as it is costlier than the bicycle, moreover, it pollutes the air, therefore, people have faced or suffered from various diseases like asthma. According to the WHO, every year 4. 2 million people died from air pollution.
In conclusion, to sum up all the points above, it is clear that cycling has numerous advantages from both a health and environmental perspective than automobiles. So, in my opinion, people in the city should use cycles for their daily travel.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, if, moreover, second, secondly, so, therefore, for example, in conclusion, such as, as a result, in my opinion, to sum up, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 13.1623246493 46% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 7.85571142285 153% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 10.4138276553 134% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 7.30460921844 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 16.0 24.0651302605 66% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 41.998997996 93% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1721.0 1615.20841683 107% => OK
No of words: 343.0 315.596192385 109% => OK
Chars per words: 5.01749271137 5.12529762239 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.30351707066 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.84686674667 2.80592935109 101% => OK
Unique words: 188.0 176.041082164 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.548104956268 0.561755894193 98% => OK
syllable_count: 544.5 506.74238477 107% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 11.0 4.76152304609 231% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 57.2648796033 49.4020404114 116% => OK
Chars per sentence: 101.235294118 106.682146367 95% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.1764705882 20.7667163134 97% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.82352941176 7.06120827912 139% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.206327300225 0.244688304435 84% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0671002664518 0.084324248473 80% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0472396951565 0.0667982634062 71% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.137457358266 0.151304729494 91% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0642566411544 0.056905535591 113% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.3 13.0946893788 94% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 50.2224549098 102% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.84 12.4159519038 95% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.82 8.58950901804 103% => OK
difficult_words: 91.0 78.4519038076 116% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.