It would be argued by some that should block students who using smarts phone in the school. In my opinion, however, students should have the right to phones in school.
On the one hand, there are a number of reasons why some believe that banned from their phones all of the day. The first reason is to distract and spend a larger amount of time on play games or chat online with friends. Another reason is to get lower grades day by day and excessive consumption of phones make he or she feels failing health lead to suffering from various health issues. A case in point, Ly is my friend, she always plays games and chats online with her friend on a daily basis lead to she makes more errors in test and she feels suffer from boredom and stress every day.
On the other hand, I would argue that should have the freedom to use the smarts phone because students would develop essential skills on the internet. Besides, the students will learn how to deal with difficult situations more effectively in their life. From experience, she or he can achieve better academic results in the test. For example, My cousin often learns distance learning programs and he has more opportunities to get a well-paid job to be better prepared for their future career in the university in the future.
In conclusion, although some people think that students should not use their phones, I personally believe that students should be allowed to use phones in school.
- The chart below shows global sales of the top five mobile phone brands between 2009 and 2013 33
- The chart below shows global sales of the top five mobile phone brands between 2009 and 2013 73
- Some people say that the best way to improve public health is by increasing the number of sports facilities Others however say that this would have little effect on public health and that other measures are required Discuss both these views and give yo 61
- The percentage of men and women aged 60 64 who were employed in four countries in 1970 and 2000 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant
- The chart below shows the expenditure of two countries on consumer goods in 2010 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ld have the right to phones in school. On the one hand, there are a number of r...
^^^
Line 2, column 98, Rule ID: ALL_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'all the'.
Suggestion: all the
...e believe that banned from their phones all of the day. The first reason is to distract an...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 75, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'smarts'' or 'smart's'?
Suggestion: smarts'; smart's
...that should have the freedom to use the smarts phone because students would develop es...
^^^^^^
Line 3, column 367, Rule ID: AFFORD_VB[1]
Message: This verb is used with the infinitive: 'to distance'
Suggestion: to distance
...st. For example, My cousin often learns distance learning programs and he has more oppor...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, first, however, if, so, well, for example, in conclusion, in my opinion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 13.1623246493 53% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 24.0 24.0651302605 100% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 41.998997996 93% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 8.3376753507 36% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1193.0 1615.20841683 74% => OK
No of words: 256.0 315.596192385 81% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.66015625 5.12529762239 91% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.0 4.20363070211 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.32615465595 2.80592935109 83% => OK
Unique words: 143.0 176.041082164 81% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.55859375 0.561755894193 99% => OK
syllable_count: 360.0 506.74238477 71% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.60771543086 87% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 16.0721442886 68% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 43.6886050919 49.4020404114 88% => OK
Chars per sentence: 108.454545455 106.682146367 102% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.2727272727 20.7667163134 112% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.0 7.06120827912 127% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.01903807615 80% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.387886282569 0.244688304435 159% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.155210285372 0.084324248473 184% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.151833541676 0.0667982634062 227% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.279089946228 0.151304729494 184% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.147501006711 0.056905535591 259% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.2 13.0946893788 93% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 65.05 50.2224549098 130% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.3001002004 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.04 12.4159519038 81% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.98 8.58950901804 93% => OK
difficult_words: 52.0 78.4519038076 66% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.