Some people believe that it is good to share as much information as possible in scientific research, business and the academic world. Others believe that some information is too important or too valuable to be shared freely.
Discuss both these views and give your own opinion.
These days, more and more people share data with each other in order to contribute to the society for its development in terms of science and business. Although many argue that there is no need to make all information accessible for everyone, I believe that people ought to be more generous for spreading information across the globe.
One the one hand, university researchers are generally rely on a wide range of sources which are accessible via the Internet. For example, to carry out certain types of investigations, professors or even students primarily depend on the results of their colleagues from the overseas. To do so, private information should be open by most international scientists. In addition, an economist strives to make statistics for several countries which include not only an annual growth of the revenue, but also the probability of an economic recession, which may pose a threat to the society, unless it is anticipated on a timely basis.
On the other hand, sharing excessive amount of open information could have some drawbacks. Firstly, an investigator, who has collected data constantly for several months or years, might be unpaid. As a result, data gathering might become less attractive job which makes difficult to find useful information, even though it costs a fortune.
In conclusion, despite having some disadvantages, freely sharing data should be applied in all of domains to achieve a success, as well as to anticipate possible risks. I believe that the generosity of exchanging data among people is likely to lead towards the bright future.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 56, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'relied'.
Suggestion: relied
...d, university researchers are generally rely on a wide range of sources which are ac...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, if, may, so, well, as to, for example, in addition, in conclusion, as a result, as well as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 10.4138276553 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 10.0 24.0651302605 42% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 41.998997996 88% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1335.0 1615.20841683 83% => OK
No of words: 257.0 315.596192385 81% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.19455252918 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.00390054096 4.20363070211 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.96830292732 2.80592935109 106% => OK
Unique words: 165.0 176.041082164 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.642023346304 0.561755894193 114% => OK
syllable_count: 433.8 506.74238477 86% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 2.10420841683 238% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 16.0721442886 68% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 49.9641193572 49.4020404114 101% => OK
Chars per sentence: 121.363636364 106.682146367 114% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.3636363636 20.7667163134 113% => OK
Discourse Markers: 12.3636363636 7.06120827912 175% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.193152156695 0.244688304435 79% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0733277422256 0.084324248473 87% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0682634849284 0.0667982634062 102% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.119865035042 0.151304729494 79% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0541813469708 0.056905535591 95% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.7 13.0946893788 112% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 39.67 50.2224549098 79% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 11.3001002004 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.12 12.4159519038 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.14 8.58950901804 106% => OK
difficult_words: 71.0 78.4519038076 91% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 9.78957915832 153% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.7795591182 139% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.