Opinions are divided as to whether scientists or analysers should publicly share their study results or not. Several people concern about the value and criticality of many research projects while others argue that knowledge should be widely shared however important it is. In this essay, I will clarify both sides of the issue before drawing my opinion and logical conclusion.
On the one hand, the advances in science and technology have touched the lives of nearly every person on the planet and tackled a tremendous number of global-scale issues. For example, agricultural analyses help increase crop yield, hence diminish famine in many countries. In terms of medicine, vaccines developed by the cooperation of many researchers all over the world have significantly minimized the repercussions of many infectious diseases which used to be catastrophic in the past such as tuberculosis or plague. Therefore, so valuable and paramount scientific knowledge is that it should be freely shared among nations of the global village.
On the other hand, supporters of important research information should not be declared widely state that it would be acutely perilous if someone takes advantage of such information, for example, studies on nuclear weapons, for bad purposes. Furthermore, it is also true that marketing plans, patentable inventions or product designs are of private and confidential information that entrepreneurs use to compete against their rivals. Hence, it seems ignorant if a business shares those things with their competitors.
Overall, it appears to me that the stronger argument is in favor of publicly sharing the information and scientific knowledge for the sake of sustainable development of humankind. Conversely, research relating to trading strategies or likely to be manipulated for injurious purposes should be strictly saved.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 22, Rule ID: WHETHER[6]
Message: Can you shorten this phrase to just 'whether', or rephrase the sentence to avoid "as to"?
Suggestion: whether
Opinions are divided as to whether scientists or analysers should publicly...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 397, Rule ID: USE_TO_VERB[1]
Message: Did you mean 'used'?
Suggestion: used
...idential information that entrepreneurs use to compete against their rivals. Hence,...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, conversely, furthermore, hence, however, if, so, therefore, while, as to, for example, such as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 20.0 24.0651302605 83% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 41.998997996 90% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1584.0 1615.20841683 98% => OK
No of words: 284.0 315.596192385 90% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.57746478873 5.12529762239 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.10515524023 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.02033871333 2.80592935109 108% => OK
Unique words: 184.0 176.041082164 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.647887323944 0.561755894193 115% => OK
syllable_count: 503.1 506.74238477 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 51.9751543208 49.4020404114 105% => OK
Chars per sentence: 132.0 106.682146367 124% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.6666666667 20.7667163134 114% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.91666666667 7.06120827912 140% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.18950188285 0.244688304435 77% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0647253156781 0.084324248473 77% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.044535255253 0.0667982634062 67% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.115314374794 0.151304729494 76% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0280301580616 0.056905535591 49% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.7 13.0946893788 128% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 31.21 50.2224549098 62% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.6 11.3001002004 129% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.38 12.4159519038 124% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.28 8.58950901804 120% => OK
difficult_words: 99.0 78.4519038076 126% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.