Nowadays, in this competitive and complicated world, the importance of environment is undeniable for majority of people in all over the world. Hence, to decreasing environmental issues there are lots of prominent challenges and one of the most significant of them is circumstance of utilizing packaging tools.
Some environmentalists believe that amount of packing in companies products have been increased sharply during recent decades. They insist that manufacturers should diminish packaged products by some noticeable plans seriously. Comprehensive investigations in china illustrated that usage of packaging tools has been increased more than 40% during recent 5 years in this country. Environmental experts believe that by continuing this attitude we will have many environmental problems in next 50 years undoubtedly. These experts emphasize that companies and organizations should devise some appropriate and applicable plans to alter their packaging systems by some new methods without environment`s menaces. They think that to fulfill this tendency, first of all governmental organizations should persuade industries to spend sufficient money and time in this way eagerly.
On the other hand, some social experts argue that to decline packaging systems dangerous effects on the environment, people should contribute with healthy organizations properly. These experts think that as a consequence, consumers can avoid buying packaging tools in shops and supermarkets and this phenomenon have some beneficial effects on environment. According to recent published reports in U.S. two third of people prefer to buy products with less packaging tools.
In conclusion, in contemporary century because of lots of social growths in societies people are more circumspect about their life environment. I believe that to decreasing or even eliminating perilous effects of using packaged products, governments, companies and people should pay attention to this event absolutely. I think by devise some preventive plans they can vanish detrimental influence of these products definitely.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, hence, if, so, third, i think, in conclusion, first of all, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 13.1623246493 46% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 28.0 24.0651302605 116% => OK
Preposition: 49.0 41.998997996 117% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1792.0 1615.20841683 111% => OK
No of words: 302.0 315.596192385 96% => OK
Chars per words: 5.93377483444 5.12529762239 116% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.1687104957 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.29428763743 2.80592935109 117% => OK
Unique words: 172.0 176.041082164 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.569536423841 0.561755894193 101% => OK
syllable_count: 553.5 506.74238477 109% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 28.2766940884 49.4020404114 57% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 128.0 106.682146367 120% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.5714285714 20.7667163134 104% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.35714285714 7.06120827912 90% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.186778936475 0.244688304435 76% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0692166570332 0.084324248473 82% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0463484729442 0.0667982634062 69% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.114257795789 0.151304729494 76% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0460109255626 0.056905535591 81% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.3 13.0946893788 132% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 33.24 50.2224549098 66% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 11.3001002004 122% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 17.11 12.4159519038 138% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.49 8.58950901804 110% => OK
difficult_words: 92.0 78.4519038076 117% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 9.78957915832 133% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 18.0 10.7795591182 167% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.