Nowadays, some argue that the best way to gain information is by the newspaper. At the same time, however, there is a body of opinion which claims that other media are more effective to acquire knowledge. In this essay I will examine both sides of the debate and seek a conclusion.
To begin with, it is undeniable that the information on the newspaper is professional, which is why some people consider it the most important way to access information. The reason is that reporters and editors in a newspaper company are well trained and they may collect news and compose it professionally. That is to say, they know how to organize their passages and allow their readers to understand them easily. For example, the public can readily know what is happening to astronomy due to the reader-friendly articles on the newspaper.
On the other hand, however, TV is more effective than newspapers, since it can provide its audience with vivid pictures and allow journalists and announcers to read news to them. In this way, spectators, especially those who are illiterate, can effectively understand what is happening in the world. Furthermore, internet is more efficient than newspapers to transmit messages. Compared with the latter, broadcasting slowly, the former enjoys faster speed and readers on it can receive news in a minute after it occurs. For example, there is an earthquake arising in a country and this disaster can be spread quickly on the Internet and the netizen in another country can get to know within seconds.
To summarize, there is no doubt that the newspaper is professional and can help readers to understand news easily. At the same time, however, TV is more effective than this medium and the Internet is more efficient. In the final analysis, therefore, one can only conclude that TV and Internet are the best way to broadcast news.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
furthermore, however, may, second, so, therefore, well, for example, no doubt, to begin with, on the other hand, that is to say
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 21.0 13.1623246493 160% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 10.4138276553 125% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 26.0 24.0651302605 108% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 41.998997996 95% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.3376753507 48% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1551.0 1615.20841683 96% => OK
No of words: 312.0 315.596192385 99% => OK
Chars per words: 4.97115384615 5.12529762239 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.20279927342 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.88221944657 2.80592935109 103% => OK
Unique words: 160.0 176.041082164 91% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.512820512821 0.561755894193 91% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 492.3 506.74238477 97% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 9.0 4.76152304609 189% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 32.7166963831 49.4020404114 66% => OK
Chars per sentence: 103.4 106.682146367 97% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.8 20.7667163134 100% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.46666666667 7.06120827912 120% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 8.67935871743 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.206700852885 0.244688304435 84% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.071172620533 0.084324248473 84% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0531965402045 0.0667982634062 80% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.138409257366 0.151304729494 91% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0518790210899 0.056905535591 91% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.4 13.0946893788 95% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 50.2224549098 102% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.55 12.4159519038 93% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.42 8.58950901804 98% => OK
difficult_words: 75.0 78.4519038076 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.