In the last decades with advances in flight technologies, travelling across the world is easier. While this is a good thing it in general, it also brings some problems like adapting new cultures and customs. Although it is a necessity to adjust our behaviors in the new country, it should not be obligatory to give up all our lifestyle.
First of all there might be religious beliefs and sacred subjects, which you cannot ignore, and respect them as they are. For example, cows are sacred in India, which is why they don’t eat them, it is rude and arrogant to insist on this. Similarly, in some Islamic countries you have to wear clothes, according to the rules of Islam. It would be useless and disrespectful to argue with the local people about those subjects.
On the other hand, since the globalization is inevitable, the host country should also inform the people who would be travelling to their country about certain local customs. There should be open warnings to avoid unpleasant misunderstandings. Moreover, in an ideal world, they should provide the people alternatives to let them feel comfortable. Even if it is not popular or not so suitable for the host country, the governments can provide support for those places. This can increase the adaptability of the people both in the host country and the traveler. Respect is the sum of action or thoughts, which should be bidirectional.
To conclude, we have to understand that, there are 7 billion people living around the world, while most of them can have roughly similar traditions, others may differ grossly, where we should respect others lifestyles, both in our home country and places where we visit.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 245, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Similarly,
...is rude and arrogant to insist on this. Similarly in some Islamic countries you have to w...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 318, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...y should provide the people alternatives to let them feel comfortable. Even if it...
^^
Line 5, column 612, Rule ID: IS_SHOULD[1]
Message: Did you mean 'it'?
Suggestion: it
...is the sum of action or thoughts, which is should be bidirectional. To conclude...
^^
Line 7, column 272, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...home country and places where we visit.
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, if, may, moreover, similarly, so, while, for example, in general, first of all, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 13.1623246493 137% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 7.85571142285 178% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 29.0 24.0651302605 121% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 41.998997996 86% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 8.3376753507 12% => More nominalization wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1404.0 1615.20841683 87% => OK
No of words: 283.0 315.596192385 90% => OK
Chars per words: 4.96113074205 5.12529762239 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.10153676581 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.78105117747 2.80592935109 99% => OK
Unique words: 158.0 176.041082164 90% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.558303886926 0.561755894193 99% => OK
syllable_count: 425.7 506.74238477 84% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Interrogative: 1.0 0.384769539078 260% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 2.10420841683 238% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 48.9631264841 49.4020404114 99% => OK
Chars per sentence: 100.285714286 106.682146367 94% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.2142857143 20.7667163134 97% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.85714285714 7.06120827912 111% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.01903807615 80% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.233156597806 0.244688304435 95% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0754210326777 0.084324248473 89% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0688972251552 0.0667982634062 103% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.130626421063 0.151304729494 86% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0764523593994 0.056905535591 134% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.0 13.0946893788 92% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 50.2224549098 119% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.3001002004 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.49 12.4159519038 93% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.7 8.58950901804 101% => OK
difficult_words: 73.0 78.4519038076 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.