Some people claim that museums and art galleries are not needed today, because everyone can see historical objects or art works by computer. Do you agree or disagree?
The technological revolution indeed gives humans a variety of benefits including art aspects. From my personal perspective, however, I am opposed to the rejection of the traditional showplace power.
Apparently, there is a diversity of reasons why museums and art galleries are still being built and preserved. In terms of theoretical indication, a museum is a place aesthetically showing the cultural beauty by physical objects as well as maintaining them in order to transmit their crucially meaningful values to the society. Besides, it is undeniable that most people easily perceive new knowledge by hand touches or visual eyesight in reality. For example, if no historical museums existed, people would difficultly imagine and understand how human beings survived and lived over the past periods.
On the other hand, despite a great assemblage of advantages brought about by technology which helps global residents closely approach the artistic or historic information via virtual means such as photos and videos uploaded on the Internet, the claim that exhibited places are not vital is flawed. Particularly, museums and exhibitions are one of the bucker-listed destinations promoting the beauty of a specific area when tourists, who have the curiousness about its culture, visit. Consequently, those attractions could make a huge amount of money to effectively contribute to the national wealth, thus, the unemployment rate could be decreased due to the rise of opportunities made by the necessary amount of labor needed for this field.
To sum up, by the virtue of essential positive influences towards the social advancement such as the way of passionately obtaining knowledge and effects on tourism, it is conspicuous that traditional exhibition is hardly substituted by technological instruments
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-02-12 | hahannguyen | 89 | view |
| 2022-05-08 | HappyCandy | 73 | view |
| 2022-05-08 | HappyCandy | 56 | view |
| 2022-05-08 | HappyCandy | 84 | view |
| 2021-11-28 | besuxinh | 56 | view |
- The table shows the expenditure on various types of food in one European country in 1992 2002 and 2012 73
- You should spend about 20 minutes on this task The Table below shows the results of a survey that asked 6800 Scottish adults aged 16 years and over whether they had taken part in different cultural activities in the past 12 months Summarize the informatio 78
- Some people think that people who choose a job early and keep doing it are more likely to have a satisfying career life than those who frequently change jobs To what extent do you agree or disagree 84
- The charts illustrate the number of people who were affected by 4 types of noise pollution in day and night in cities and rural areas in 2007 84
- The graph shows the information about the international conferences in three capital cities in 1980 2010 84
Transition Words or Phrases used:
apparently, besides, but, consequently, however, if, so, still, thus, well, for example, such as, as well as, to sum up, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 7.85571142285 38% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 12.0 24.0651302605 50% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 41.998997996 90% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1534.0 1615.20841683 95% => OK
No of words: 276.0 315.596192385 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.55797101449 5.12529762239 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.07593519647 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.19455927942 2.80592935109 114% => OK
Unique words: 192.0 176.041082164 109% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.695652173913 0.561755894193 124% => OK
syllable_count: 487.8 506.74238477 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 16.0721442886 62% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 27.0 20.2975951904 133% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 70.7378258077 49.4020404114 143% => OK
Chars per sentence: 153.4 106.682146367 144% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.6 20.7667163134 133% => OK
Discourse Markers: 13.8 7.06120827912 195% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.126817534907 0.244688304435 52% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0457147303808 0.084324248473 54% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0419183601536 0.0667982634062 63% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0603670433435 0.151304729494 40% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0527252023875 0.056905535591 93% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.6 13.0946893788 142% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 27.15 50.2224549098 54% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 13.0 7.44779559118 175% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 16.2 11.3001002004 143% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.26 12.4159519038 123% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 11.21 8.58950901804 131% => OK
difficult_words: 109.0 78.4519038076 139% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 10.1190380762 126% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.