Some people claim that not enough of the waste from homes is recycled. They say that the only way to increase recycling is for governments to make it a legal requirement.
To what extent do you think laws are needed to make people recycle more of their waste?
It is difficult to conceive a sustainable economic growth without a clean and healthy living condition for people. For this reason, many suggest a new legislation on household waste recycling as the only way to protect the living environment. I partly agree with this statement.
On the one hand, I concur that a law on waste recycling is a promising approach to the problems of waste from households. It is true that when a bill is adopted and made into a law, people undoubtedly pay more attention to it and take it with more serious consideration. If they know that they can be fined, punished or even imprisoned for not obeying recycling laws, they will certainly abide by the laws and take more responsibility for classifying the waste from their homes. This will gradually form a good habit of protecting the surrounding environment among the population. For this reason, more waste from home can be recycled, contributing to a cleaner environment.
On the other hand, I do not agree that this is the only measure to increase recycling because education can be equally or even more effective to solve the problem of household waste. For example, governments should have well-trained teachers impart the knowledge of how to properly recycle household waste to students. Children who receive this knowledge can recycle with a higher level of effectiveness and success than those who do not. Another reason why I do not agree with this new law is that this policy is apparently impractical to low-income families who are already struggling with many problems in their life. A law on treating waste from their homes just places a heavier burden and greater anxiety on them.
In conclusion, the introduction of a new law on treating waste from homes can be an effective measure to some extent, but this would certainly not be the only way and not a feasible measure to unstable income families.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
apparently, but, if, so, well, for example, in conclusion, it is true, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 30.0 24.0651302605 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 41.0 41.998997996 98% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1584.0 1615.20841683 98% => OK
No of words: 321.0 315.596192385 102% => OK
Chars per words: 4.93457943925 5.12529762239 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.23278547379 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.88384018197 2.80592935109 103% => OK
Unique words: 165.0 176.041082164 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.514018691589 0.561755894193 92% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 504.9 506.74238477 100% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 47.6627715929 49.4020404114 96% => OK
Chars per sentence: 113.142857143 106.682146367 106% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.9285714286 20.7667163134 110% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.28571428571 7.06120827912 89% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 3.9879759519 201% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.329084771121 0.244688304435 134% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.116676395579 0.084324248473 138% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0761311954805 0.0667982634062 114% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.196340841202 0.151304729494 130% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0670937691814 0.056905535591 118% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.3 13.0946893788 102% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 50.2224549098 98% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.61 12.4159519038 94% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.42 8.58950901804 98% => OK
difficult_words: 75.0 78.4519038076 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.