Some people claim that not enough of the waste from homes is recycled. They say that the only way to increase recycling is for governments to make it a legal requirement. To what extent do you think laws are needed to make people recycle more of their waste?
Nowadays, people produce millions of tonnes of wastes from household activities and some of them could be recycled. However, it is true that many of us do not recycle this waste but simply dump them in dumping site. It is not uncommon to hear that this problem can be solved only be legislating a new piece of law. However, I strongly disagree with such opinions as I believe that government should provide incentives to encourage recycling of wastes rather than enacting laws.
Firstly, any law that compels people to recycle their household wastes tramples their freedoms and rights. It is likely to put unnecessary burden and hardship on the community where the benefits and returns are simply difficult to quantify. If government passes such laws, people may have to walk miles every day to find the recycling centres as such centres cannot be established within the vicinity of every accommodation. In this process, people lose their precious time and may not able to attend their daily and other important activities.
Secondly, it is difficult to monitor and implement such laws as security personnel cannot knock every door and find out if the family has obeyed the laws. For example, people may simply throw the garbage on the street at night in violation of the laws and government will not be able to do anything. Such laws are in fact, mockery of the law enactment procedures and our parliaments should spend time on more vital issues. Because of the possibility of ineffectual implementation and enforcement, such laws can not promote the good cause.
In my conclusion, people are likely not to get encouraged to recycle the litter from their house only because there are laws to compel them to do so. Such laws come on the way of people’s freedoms and also are also likely to be violated often making them unworkable.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, however, if, may, second, secondly, so, for example, in fact, it is true
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 10.4138276553 125% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 25.0 24.0651302605 104% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 41.998997996 100% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1537.0 1615.20841683 95% => OK
No of words: 311.0 315.596192385 99% => OK
Chars per words: 4.9421221865 5.12529762239 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.19942759058 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.67458407711 2.80592935109 95% => OK
Unique words: 169.0 176.041082164 96% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.543408360129 0.561755894193 97% => OK
syllable_count: 487.8 506.74238477 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 24.2781500825 49.4020404114 49% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 109.785714286 106.682146367 103% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.2142857143 20.7667163134 107% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.07142857143 7.06120827912 100% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 8.67935871743 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 3.9879759519 201% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.277375319827 0.244688304435 113% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.096345681081 0.084324248473 114% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0638788780101 0.0667982634062 96% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.174106038206 0.151304729494 115% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0428451531249 0.056905535591 75% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.9 13.0946893788 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 50.2224549098 98% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.37 12.4159519038 92% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.43 8.58950901804 98% => OK
difficult_words: 73.0 78.4519038076 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.78957915832 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.