Some people claim that not enough of the waste from homes is recycled. They say that the only way to increase recycling is for governments to make it a legal requirement.
To what extent do you think laws are needed to make people recycle more of their waste?
It is a fact that, over the past few decades managing our waste has been a major problem because we are reluctant to recycle our waste. According to some people, governments need to take care of it by imposing laws. I slightly agree with the statement because, i think government should take others steps like raising awareness constructing infrastructure prior to penalize people.
Firstly, in order to make people habituated to do something we need to spread the knowledge. Making people aware of the consequences of unrecycled waste should be the first step. What are the environmental implications of dumping waste everywhere. The government has to publicize this message through state media as well as other private medias. Therefore it would make certain portion of people conscious regarding recycling.
Secondly, it is a fact that, except several developed countries the adequate infrastructure requires in order to recycle waste is absent. That includes most of the countries in Africa, Asia and South America. Dumping zone like dustbin, truck to transport waste and most importantly recycling centre needs to be built. If people find it convenient to dump their waste then this is going to discourage people from throwing waste all over the place. So, if wastes are being dumped in a proper place and with adequate number of recycling facilities it would make the recycling much easier.
Finally, law can be imposed if the government fails to make people contribute to recycling. Fines can be imposed of someone dumps something on the street notwithstanding having a bin where trash could be dumped. For instance, it is a 200 pound fine in London if someone throws house trash outside of the trash can. This would push people to be more conscious about recycling.
In conclusion, governments have to give people the opportunity to help recycle their waste and a way to about being penalized. If nothing works for the government then it may take the help of the law to solve the problem.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 262, Rule ID: I_LOWERCASE[2]
Message: Did you mean 'I'?
Suggestion: I
...ghtly agree with the statement because, i think government should take others ste...
^
Line 3, column 347, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Therefore,
... media as well as other private medias. Therefore it would make certain portion of people...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 319, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “If” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...tly recycling centre needs to be built. If people find it convenient to dump their...
^^
Line 9, column 189, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...the government then it may take the help of the law to solve the problem.
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, finally, first, firstly, if, may, regarding, second, secondly, so, then, therefore, well, as to, for instance, i think, in conclusion, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 13.1623246493 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 7.85571142285 153% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 10.4138276553 38% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 22.0 24.0651302605 91% => OK
Preposition: 52.0 41.998997996 124% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1680.0 1615.20841683 104% => OK
No of words: 331.0 315.596192385 105% => OK
Chars per words: 5.07552870091 5.12529762239 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.26537283232 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.81389085851 2.80592935109 100% => OK
Unique words: 184.0 176.041082164 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.555891238671 0.561755894193 99% => OK
syllable_count: 522.9 506.74238477 103% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 16.0721442886 118% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 27.7440817477 49.4020404114 56% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 88.4210526316 106.682146367 83% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.4210526316 20.7667163134 84% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.89473684211 7.06120827912 112% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.01903807615 80% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 3.9879759519 201% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.340226210845 0.244688304435 139% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.104494689618 0.084324248473 124% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0685742683502 0.0667982634062 103% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.185886188661 0.151304729494 123% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0689840540226 0.056905535591 121% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.2 13.0946893788 86% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 54.22 50.2224549098 108% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.3001002004 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.89 12.4159519038 96% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.96 8.58950901804 93% => OK
difficult_words: 73.0 78.4519038076 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.