Some people prefer to work for a big company instead of a small, family-run, business. What are the advantages and disadvantages?
it is widely acknowledged that job seekers tend to apply to prestigious companies, instead of working for unknown facilities, or family-run. from my perspective, while laboring for huge industries as opposed to small-scale companies can be beneficial, the drawbacks of this should be taken into consideration.
On the one hand, there are several reasons why working for a vast business can be beneficial, the most significant of which are to improve qualifications and experience learning from the best. With regard to the former, a huge company will enhance the level of staff to increase work productivity. For example, they will invest in a lot of training courses about professional skills for employees. And these courses will help staff expand their horizon in work. When it comes to the latter, a large company typically attracts a pool of contingent employees' talent. For instance, working with excellent people result in having the opportunity to gain plenty of a deal of knowledge about different areas
Contrarily, laboring in a large industry can have some demerits, associated with bureaucracy and stiff competition. When it comes to the first idea, the upper echelon work irresponsibly and bully staff. For instance, they use their power to force employees to work with high intensity. As far as the second point is concerned, the huge business is the place where staff are ready to combat for their promote position with the pressures of high work. For example, It’s not uncommon to witness staff who is willing to do mountain projects for fulfilling the assigned responsibilities by superior.
In conclusion, I am inclined to believe that despite the positive effects that working in a vast company can exert, the negative implications should not be underestimated.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: It
it is widely acknowledged that job seekers...
^^
Line 2, column 142, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: From
... for unknown facilities, or family-run. from my perspective, while laboring for huge...
^^^^
Line 4, column 548, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'employees'' or 'employee's'?
Suggestion: employees'; employee's
...typically attracts a pool of contingent employees talent. For instance, working with exce...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, if, second, so, while, for example, for instance, in conclusion, with regard to
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 10.4138276553 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 16.0 24.0651302605 66% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 41.998997996 102% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1509.0 1615.20841683 93% => OK
No of words: 286.0 315.596192385 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.27622377622 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.11236361783 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.06584344977 2.80592935109 109% => OK
Unique words: 169.0 176.041082164 96% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.590909090909 0.561755894193 105% => OK
syllable_count: 468.9 506.74238477 93% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 7.0 2.52805611222 277% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 51.6529153934 49.4020404114 105% => OK
Chars per sentence: 116.076923077 106.682146367 109% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.0 20.7667163134 106% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.61538461538 7.06120827912 94% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.246506981104 0.244688304435 101% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0834222620031 0.084324248473 99% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0393568214084 0.0667982634062 59% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.142076592937 0.151304729494 94% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0488029943656 0.056905535591 86% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.4 13.0946893788 110% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 50.2224549098 98% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.34 12.4159519038 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.2 8.58950901804 107% => OK
difficult_words: 81.0 78.4519038076 103% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.