It has become a consensus that charity organizations have the responsibility providing necessary aid to the people who lived in a poor condition. Nowadays, it is a controversial issue whether those charity organizations should pay attention to their own country. From my perspective, more benefits will surface when charity organization focus on the people wherever they live.
On the one hand, it seems more reasonable for charity organizations to help the citizens who lived in their country. Firstly, this help from charity organizations to the natives is definitely more precise. Without language barrier and distance limitations, it is easy for public to find out the people who really need the help. As a consequence, the funds of charity organizations can be used more effective. Secondly, all the results of these actions can be seen and supervised by charity organizations as well as the whole public. It is undoubtedly of benefit to prevent corruption.
On the other hand, other people believe an opposite opinion that the needs of help rather than the distance should be the main concern to the charity organizations. It is a common acceptance that more people are living in poor condition that need necessary help from overseas. To illustrate, many people who live in a developing country especially in some African country are suffering from poverty and starve. If the charity organizations only funded their dwellers in industrial country, it may intensify the conflicts between poor and wealthy countries. In addition, those agricultural countries are prone to beat by disasters and diseases and they are unable to get rid of those nightmares. Therefore, it makes sense that charity organizations in other countries to give vaccines for charity organizations in other countries.
In conclusion, both two ways have its own merits and as far as I am concerned, based on the humanitarianism, it is better for the whole world that the charity organizations have a more spacious view instead of giving priority to their own residents.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, firstly, if, may, really, second, secondly, so, therefore, well, in addition, in conclusion, as well as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 7.30460921844 151% => OK
Pronoun: 29.0 24.0651302605 121% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 42.0 41.998997996 100% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1728.0 1615.20841683 107% => OK
No of words: 328.0 315.596192385 104% => OK
Chars per words: 5.26829268293 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.25567506705 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.15228569708 2.80592935109 112% => OK
Unique words: 171.0 176.041082164 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.521341463415 0.561755894193 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 558.9 506.74238477 110% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 11.0 5.43587174349 202% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 41.3338163614 49.4020404114 84% => OK
Chars per sentence: 108.0 106.682146367 101% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.5 20.7667163134 99% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.0625 7.06120827912 114% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 8.67935871743 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.283062155924 0.244688304435 116% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0964139383958 0.084324248473 114% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0479540136983 0.0667982634062 72% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.178825136154 0.151304729494 118% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0786737034325 0.056905535591 138% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.6 13.0946893788 104% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.72 50.2224549098 85% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.29 12.4159519038 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.38 8.58950901804 98% => OK
difficult_words: 78.0 78.4519038076 99% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.