Some people say that economic growth is the only way to end hunger and poverty, while others say that economic growth is damaging the environment so it should be stopped. Discuss both views and give your opinion.
Some people are saying that the rapid growth of economic development is the only way to end the suffering of hunger and poverty, while others are arguing that this situation should be stopped as it’s destroying the environment. In my opinion, I believe that there are several damages in the environment in which the growth of the economy brings.
On the one hand, economic activities are undoubtedly effective tools when it comes to poverty in all nations. Without strong finance, governments can not afford to support citizens who need and therefore, slowing the overall development of the whole nation down. Only the growth of the economies can provide lower inhabitants with employments opportunities and saving many lives from the cycle of food shortage. For example, the more advanced an economic system is, the larger the demand for labor there is, and further hunger is repelled. Consequently, this would ensure stable payment, thereby helping individuals escape from chronic poverty.
On the other hand, the rapid development of a nation could bring detrimental impacts to the environment. Firstly, ozone depletion is one severe consequence of economic industrialization. This is caused by the increase in the number of factories and vehicles which release more emissions into the surroundings. As a result, the human is now facing a high risk of skin cancer by exposing directly to UV rays from the sun. Secondly, economic achievements are associated with greater consumption of resources for energy or traveling. Actions such as deforestation to cultivate crops will destroy natural habitat and imbalance the nature world. When trees are being cut off, a wide area will not be covered and the soil will be eroded by rains in the long term. Furthermore, the earth will lose its natural air-filtering system which worsens the current air pollution caused by the car’s exhaust fumes.
In conclusion, while economic growth shows a certain profit in solving the world’s hunger, the consequence of environmental deterioration will directly affect human health adversely in the long term.
- The plans below show a student room for two people and a student room for one person at an Australian university 73
- The graph below gives information about car ownership in the UK from 1975 to 2005 78
- More and more people are suffering from health problems caused by a modern lifestyle which cannot be treated with modern medicines Some people think that a return to traditional medicine should be encouraged To what extent do you agree or disagree 89
- The chart below shows waste collection by a recycling centre from 2011 to 2015 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
- The increase in the production of consumer goods results in damage to the natural environment What are the causes of this What can be done to solve this problem 80
Transition Words or Phrases used:
consequently, first, firstly, furthermore, second, secondly, so, therefore, while, for example, in conclusion, such as, as a result, in my opinion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 13.1623246493 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 11.0 24.0651302605 46% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 41.998997996 100% => OK
Nominalization: 18.0 8.3376753507 216% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1778.0 1615.20841683 110% => OK
No of words: 333.0 315.596192385 106% => OK
Chars per words: 5.33933933934 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.27180144563 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.93510631551 2.80592935109 105% => OK
Unique words: 203.0 176.041082164 115% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.60960960961 0.561755894193 109% => OK
syllable_count: 556.2 506.74238477 110% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 7.0 2.52805611222 277% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 36.8688024453 49.4020404114 75% => OK
Chars per sentence: 111.125 106.682146367 104% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.8125 20.7667163134 100% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.3125 7.06120827912 146% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 3.9879759519 201% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.273158478143 0.244688304435 112% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0738492858717 0.084324248473 88% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.11100178195 0.0667982634062 166% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.197057102161 0.151304729494 130% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.173496065013 0.056905535591 305% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.1 13.0946893788 108% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.72 50.2224549098 85% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.69 12.4159519038 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.75 8.58950901804 114% => OK
difficult_words: 108.0 78.4519038076 138% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 9.78957915832 153% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.