Historical buildings are believed to be valuable in this 21st century; however, some individuals think that high authority needs to demolish old buildings in order to build modern buildings. I do not consent to this point of view, and further, the supportive viewpoints are yet to be analyzed in the subsequent paragraphs.
The benefits of old buildings need to be considered, which seem to be effective in certain ways. Firstly, the preservation of culture is feasible as every nation has its own historical background that exhibits old civilization, whereby the new generation comes to know about the living style of ancient people how they lived in the past. Secondly, visiting these buildings makes the modern people understand the sacrifices of their revolutionary leaders for the triumph of the country; therefore, they try to be respectful of their nation.
Thirdly, old buildings seem to rise the economy of the country, thereby visiting tourists from different places because they spend large sums of money in terms of buying tickets and accommodation. Apart from this, tourists show their tendency for purchasing handicrafts, which is helpful for small scale businesses, due to this the businessmen become enable to expand more in the market. Finally, visiting the tourists leads to strong correlations with the local communities across the world.
In conclusion, though modern buildings have immense importance in this contemporary world, having said that the role of historical buildings cannot be overlooked; thus, the government should be in favor of preserving these buildings.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 541, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...y try to be respectful of their nation. Thirdly, old buildings seem to rise the ...
^^^
Line 3, column 494, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...the local communities across the world. In conclusion, though modern buildings h...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, first, firstly, however, if, look, second, secondly, so, therefore, third, thirdly, thus, apart from, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 7.85571142285 38% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 10.4138276553 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 18.0 24.0651302605 75% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 41.998997996 98% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1350.0 1615.20841683 84% => OK
No of words: 248.0 315.596192385 79% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.4435483871 5.12529762239 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.96837696647 4.20363070211 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.95943569374 2.80592935109 105% => OK
Unique words: 154.0 176.041082164 87% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.620967741935 0.561755894193 111% => OK
syllable_count: 403.2 506.74238477 80% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 16.0721442886 56% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 27.0 20.2975951904 133% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 49.8553463087 49.4020404114 101% => OK
Chars per sentence: 150.0 106.682146367 141% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.5555555556 20.7667163134 133% => OK
Discourse Markers: 13.7777777778 7.06120827912 195% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.170640551896 0.244688304435 70% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.067125809885 0.084324248473 80% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0623671742546 0.0667982634062 93% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.11128862878 0.151304729494 74% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0584245515107 0.056905535591 103% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.0 13.0946893788 137% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.07 50.2224549098 88% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 11.3001002004 122% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.57 12.4159519038 117% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.62 8.58950901804 112% => OK
difficult_words: 73.0 78.4519038076 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 9.78957915832 153% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 10.1190380762 126% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.7795591182 139% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Minimum 250 words wanted.
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.