Some people say that the main environmental problem of our time is the loss of particular species of plants and animals. Others say that there are more important environmental problems.
Discuss both these views and give your own opinion.
In contemporary society, whether or not the risks of endangered flora and fauna are the most serious consequences of our worsening environment has become a controversial issue in many parts of the world. It is argued that the loss of wildlife is the most urgent. Nevertheless, I maintain that the negative impact of other natural disasters outweighs that of non-existent plants and animals for several reasons.
On the one hand, the disappearance of wild animals can entail the lack of natural balance of all creatures on the Earth. This can lead to food shortages in many countries that suffer from the population boom. In addition, the extinction of some plants can have a lot of domino effects on people’s lives. For example, flood and soil erosion have happened and lasted long for many years; as a result, people withstand the failure of crops and cannot ensure a good financial health. Besides, when fauna and flora die, soil can be supplied nutrients to make the high qualities and quantities of agricultural products. If not enough wild creatures left, fields will become exhausted and turn from the cultivated land to the wasteland.
On the other hand, I incline that some disasters which stem from climate change can be more dangerous. Firstly, some countries nowadays, such as Japan or Australia, have to face disasters related to temperature degrees like hurricanes, tsunamis, and blizzards. Many unfortunate people died because of these, however, the lack of foods or nutritious soil can be reduced and rehabilitated without any death. Moreover, the COVID-19 epidemic can result in a high mortality rate all over the world.
To sum up, while the extinction of plants and animals can have some consequences, other disasters are far more dangerous because their consequences are immediate and more pressing. I suggest that the government should place more importance on protecting-environment awareness than on entertainment or tourist facilities.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-11-30 | Daniel3003 | 73 | view |
| 2023-11-30 | Daniel3003 | 73 | view |
| 2023-11-13 | Mayuresh0809 | 61 | view |
| 2023-10-15 | kheradpishe | 73 | view |
| 2023-09-05 | Mollymaul | 84 | view |
- The chart and table give information about health resources and life expectancy in different countries 73
- The chart and table below give information about healthcare resources and life expectancy in different countries Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 73
- Some people think that governments should give financial support to creative artists such as painters and musicians Others believe that creative artists should be funded by alternative sources 89
- the graph below shows the number of tourists visiting a particular Caribbean island between 2010 and 2017 summaries the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 73
- The maps below illustrate how Frenton changed from 1990 to 2012 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 26, Rule ID: WHETHER[7]
Message: Perhaps you can shorten this phrase to just 'whether'. It is correct though if you mean 'regardless of whether'.
Suggestion: whether
In contemporary society, whether or not the risks of endangered flora and fauna...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 322, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...on entertainment or tourist facilities.
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, first, firstly, however, if, moreover, nevertheless, so, while, for example, in addition, such as, as a result, to sum up, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 13.1623246493 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 16.0 10.4138276553 154% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 14.0 24.0651302605 58% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 41.998997996 95% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1652.0 1615.20841683 102% => OK
No of words: 314.0 315.596192385 99% => OK
Chars per words: 5.26114649682 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.20951839842 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.05395249253 2.80592935109 109% => OK
Unique words: 181.0 176.041082164 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.576433121019 0.561755894193 103% => OK
syllable_count: 515.7 506.74238477 102% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 38.558815104 49.4020404114 78% => OK
Chars per sentence: 110.133333333 106.682146367 103% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.9333333333 20.7667163134 101% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.93333333333 7.06120827912 141% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 8.67935871743 23% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 11.0 3.9879759519 276% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.116370010166 0.244688304435 48% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0390949332762 0.084324248473 46% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0365612437155 0.0667982634062 55% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0779102892829 0.151304729494 51% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0312818114726 0.056905535591 55% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.8 13.0946893788 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 50.2224549098 102% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.23 12.4159519038 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.15 8.58950901804 107% => OK
difficult_words: 90.0 78.4519038076 115% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.