People’s opinions differ as to whether or not advanced technology today facilitates shopping. While there are clear benefits to online shopping, such as convenience and time efficiency, I still believe that it bears some inconveniences, including the absence of try-on opportunities and inadequate refund policies.
On the one hand, online shopping is superior to the traditional shopping method in terms of its 24/7 services. Due to the unlimited operating hours of the internet, users are able to make purchase orders whenever they want. Those shopping traditionally, by contrast, have to do shopping at a fixed time. Additionally, online shoppers have more chances to get a deep insight into commodities in terms of their quality, prices and comments from other customers through the internet. Traditional shoppers often have to travel long distances to find the goods they need, which can be time-consuming.
In spite of the above arguments, I support the view that technological advancements make shopping more complicated. Firstly, for clothes purchased through the internet, trying them on is virtually impossible. Without the ability to physically check, e-commerce customers can only base on specification information from online stores, they are more likely to receive goods that do not fit properly or have minor scratches. Additionally, refund policies complicate online shopping. In reality, the process of refunding a commodity is more time-consuming and complicated as customers have to fill out a set of forms, wait for responses from stores as well as a video recording about products opened. Those shopping conventionally, on the other hand, can exchange new ones or receive reimbursement more easily in such a case.
As a result, I believe that online shopping has many benefits, including convenience and time-efficiency, but it has many drawbacks in terms of refunding and checking products in advance. I am also convinced that online shopping will be more popular if e-commerce sellers alter their selling and after-selling policies.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 26, Rule ID: WHETHER[4]
Message: Wordiness: Shorten this phrase to the shortest possible suggestion.
Suggestion: whether; whether or not; as to whether
People’s opinions differ as to whether or not advanced technology today facilitates s...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, if, so, still, well, while, as to, such as, as a result, as well as, in spite of, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 13.1623246493 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 20.0 24.0651302605 83% => OK
Preposition: 44.0 41.998997996 105% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1751.0 1615.20841683 108% => OK
No of words: 316.0 315.596192385 100% => OK
Chars per words: 5.54113924051 5.12529762239 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.21620550194 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.22813817262 2.80592935109 115% => OK
Unique words: 186.0 176.041082164 106% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.588607594937 0.561755894193 105% => OK
syllable_count: 556.2 506.74238477 110% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 50.9156164649 49.4020404114 103% => OK
Chars per sentence: 116.733333333 106.682146367 109% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.0666666667 20.7667163134 101% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.4 7.06120827912 119% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.113499543732 0.244688304435 46% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0441066736948 0.084324248473 52% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0530605120185 0.0667982634062 79% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0759910022761 0.151304729494 50% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0410790895972 0.056905535591 72% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.2 13.0946893788 116% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 33.24 50.2224549098 66% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 11.3001002004 122% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.85 12.4159519038 120% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.53 8.58950901804 111% => OK
difficult_words: 97.0 78.4519038076 124% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.7795591182 139% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.