People’s opinions differ as to whether or not advanced technology today facilitates shopping. While there are several benefits to e-commerce, including convenience and time efficiency, I still believe that it bears some inconveniences, such as the absence of try-on opportunities and inadequate refund policies.
On the one hand, online shopping is superior to conventional methods in terms of its 24/7 services. Due to the unlimited operating hours of the internet, users are able to make purchase orders whenever they want. Those shopping traditionally, however, have to do it at a fixed time. Additionally, e-shopping customers have more chances to get a deep insight into commodities in terms of their quality, prices, and comments from other consumers through the internet. Traditional shoppers often have to travel long distances just to find the goods that meet their demands, which can be time-consuming. For example, cyber shoppers can make a shopping decision quickly and accurately by reading customers’ evaluations during an after-sales service.
Despite the above arguments, I support the view that technological advancements have made shopping more complicated. Firstly, for clothes purchased via the internet, try-on opportunities are impossible. In case of unfit garments or minor scratches, e-commerce shoppers are more likely to get stuck without the ability to physically check. Secondly, there are few detailed refund or exchange terms available on online retailers, leading to a lack of understanding or even misunderstanding. Moreover, if there are refund policies, they are usually complex and intricate. For instance, those shopping on Shopee or Lazada must fill out a set of forms, and make a video recording about commodities in case of exchanging products or refunding money, while traditional customers can get money back or exchange their commodities more easily.
In conclusion, I believe that virtual shopping has many benefits, such as a convenient and time-effective shopping environment, however, it also has several drawbacks, including the lack of try-on opportunities and vague refund regulations. I am also convinced that internet-based shopping will be more popular if they change their policies about before and after-sales services.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 26, Rule ID: WHETHER[4]
Message: Wordiness: Shorten this phrase to the shortest possible suggestion.
Suggestion: whether; whether or not; as to whether
People’s opinions differ as to whether or not advanced technology today facilitates s...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, firstly, however, if, moreover, second, secondly, so, still, while, as to, for example, for instance, in conclusion, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 16.0 10.4138276553 154% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 22.0 24.0651302605 91% => OK
Preposition: 47.0 41.998997996 112% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.3376753507 48% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1940.0 1615.20841683 120% => OK
No of words: 341.0 315.596192385 108% => OK
Chars per words: 5.68914956012 5.12529762239 111% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.29722995808 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.26952249567 2.80592935109 117% => OK
Unique words: 206.0 176.041082164 117% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.604105571848 0.561755894193 108% => OK
syllable_count: 619.2 506.74238477 122% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 55.9544667006 49.4020404114 113% => OK
Chars per sentence: 121.25 106.682146367 114% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.3125 20.7667163134 103% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.5625 7.06120827912 121% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.127654089267 0.244688304435 52% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0429930906345 0.084324248473 51% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0544434907825 0.0667982634062 82% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0839767005848 0.151304729494 56% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0406950523562 0.056905535591 72% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.0 13.0946893788 122% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 33.24 50.2224549098 66% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 11.3001002004 122% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.72 12.4159519038 127% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.73 8.58950901804 113% => OK
difficult_words: 109.0 78.4519038076 139% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 16.0 10.7795591182 148% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.