Some people think that all university students should study whatever they like. Others believe that they should only be allowed to study subjects that will be useful in the future, such as those related to science and technology.
Discuss both these views and give your own opinion.
Some people opine that students should be independent in selecting the course for tertiary education while other debate for confining the students to study the particular subjects in line to usefulness in the future.
Education is the right of every individual and everyone is free to study in accordance to their interest. In the present era of globalization, the students are not confined within the community, university or nation while there is access to every pint of advancement in any nook and corner of the world through internet.
Personal interest of the individual is of prime concern regarding the study of specific subject matter. Individual preference towards specific study is bound with the passion, vision, and motivation, thereby developing a competent technical manpower.
Also, the diverse field of study helps to balance the economy of the nation through the all-round development of the nation. Expertise in various fields helps concentrate the limited manpower within the nation with good professional opportunities.
On the other hand, study in accordance to the usefulness in the future can be viewed from both sides-bright and dark. The academics in the university with particular subjects helps create abundance of manpower in the related field, however, this may directly affect the development of other sectors in the nation. Also, this may result in tremendous increase the internal competition, greater chances of brain drain, unemployment and many more. However, the government needs to adjust the policy and programmes in line with utilization of manpower efficiently.
Overall, education is the fundamental right of every individual and decision on study needs to be based on the students himself/herself. Globalization, balance of national economy along with personal interest of individual are the core forces. However, convincing policy with better economic and social environment can help attract academicians towards the specific fields.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, however, if, may, regarding, so, while, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 7.30460921844 14% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 6.0 24.0651302605 25% => OK
Preposition: 56.0 41.998997996 133% => OK
Nominalization: 19.0 8.3376753507 228% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1694.0 1615.20841683 105% => OK
No of words: 300.0 315.596192385 95% => OK
Chars per words: 5.64666666667 5.12529762239 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.16179145029 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.02841359277 2.80592935109 108% => OK
Unique words: 154.0 176.041082164 87% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.513333333333 0.561755894193 91% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 543.6 506.74238477 107% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 37.8282908924 49.4020404114 77% => OK
Chars per sentence: 121.0 106.682146367 113% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.4285714286 20.7667163134 103% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.5 7.06120827912 64% => OK
Paragraphs: 6.0 4.38176352705 137% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 8.67935871743 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.199688669963 0.244688304435 82% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0678939526945 0.084324248473 81% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0793331129518 0.0667982634062 119% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.106931309338 0.151304729494 71% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0783432327568 0.056905535591 138% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.9 13.0946893788 121% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 33.24 50.2224549098 66% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 11.3001002004 122% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.49 12.4159519038 125% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.68 8.58950901804 113% => OK
difficult_words: 95.0 78.4519038076 121% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.5 9.78957915832 158% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 16.0 10.7795591182 148% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum five paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.