Many people argued that an increasing in the minimum age of eligibility for drivers will improve road safety. While this idea might help reduce the number of road accidents, I could maintain that it is ideal to combine it with other approaches such as imposing stricter punishments and upgrading public transportation.
On the one hand, this policy might diminish traffic accidents which boosts the safety of roads. To be more specific, as commuters get older, they would become more mature and responsible when they join in a traffic, resulting in lessening traffic incidents. Moreover, this practice also deters youngsters who are immature and unaware of the repercussions of their actions from careless driving. In both of these cases, the number of road incidents which causes unsafety road is limited, generating a safer environment for other commuters.
However, an increase in older licensing ages can only solve a limited part of these complex road safety enhancement. In reality, many youngsters nowadays still join in traffic without a driving licence, which causes traffic incidents become worse. Therefore, the most effective solution would be enacting more severe punishments that prevents drivers from committing traffic-based infringements. For example, drivers who exceed the speed limit or drink alcohol while joining the traffic should have to pay a heavy monetary fine or have their drivers’ licence revoked. As a result, more drivers will obey the rules when they are in the traffic, contributing to improve the safety of roads.
In conclusion, while rising minimum of legal age of vehicle users can partly improve road safety by discouraging the young from commuting, the ideal solution would be introducing much harsher punishments on those who violate laws. In my opinion, governments must also act them urgently to alleviate the perennial problems of road accidents and other related-traffic issues.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, moreover, so, still, therefore, while, for example, in conclusion, such as, as a result, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 13.1623246493 53% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 7.85571142285 153% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 11.0 7.30460921844 151% => OK
Pronoun: 19.0 24.0651302605 79% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 41.998997996 83% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1631.0 1615.20841683 101% => OK
No of words: 300.0 315.596192385 95% => OK
Chars per words: 5.43666666667 5.12529762239 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.16179145029 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.85807044466 2.80592935109 102% => OK
Unique words: 179.0 176.041082164 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.596666666667 0.561755894193 106% => OK
syllable_count: 512.1 506.74238477 101% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 36.9728830745 49.4020404114 75% => OK
Chars per sentence: 125.461538462 106.682146367 118% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.0769230769 20.7667163134 111% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.69230769231 7.06120827912 137% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.137903580968 0.244688304435 56% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0546717794838 0.084324248473 65% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0668293342681 0.0667982634062 100% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0941580008406 0.151304729494 62% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0377398641012 0.056905535591 66% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.7 13.0946893788 120% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 39.67 50.2224549098 79% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 11.3001002004 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.57 12.4159519038 117% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.99 8.58950901804 116% => OK
difficult_words: 99.0 78.4519038076 126% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.78957915832 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.