Some people think that the best way to solve global environmental problems is to increase the cost of fuel.
To what extent do you agree or disagree?
In this day and age, extreme weather events appear more and more frequently so dealing with global environmental problems is now considered a critical issue. Some people think that increasing the fuel price is the most effective way to cope with this problem. I strongly agree with this statement for several reasons.
In fact, the main cause of global warming or air pollution is the emission produced by factories and individuals. To be specific, a hundred tons of fuels are being used per a day all over the world by numerous industries in various fields, especially in agriculture. Furthermore, the number of people using personal cars is increasing due to the affordable price of gasoline. As a result, a huge amount of toxic emission is released into the atmosphere every day. After all, it not only spoils the air but also destroys the natural habitat. Hence, not only can increasing the cost of fuel save fuel, it also protects the environment.
On other hand, when people do not want to spend a lot of money on fuel, they could find some alternative environment friendly methods. For example, people can walk to work instead of using cars or motorbikes. Therefore, they could improve their health and save the air at the same time. Besides, some prospective sources of energy could be used to alter fuels, for instance, solar power, wind power, electric,... In fact, green energy has been used for a long time. So that if the fuel cost is increased, renewable energy could be prioritized.
In conclusion, I believe that increasing the cost of fuel is the most effective way to deal with global environmental problems.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 408, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , .
...tance, solar power, wind power, electric,... In fact, green energy has been used f...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, furthermore, hence, if, so, therefore, after all, for example, for instance, in conclusion, in fact, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 13.0 24.0651302605 54% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 41.998997996 83% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1356.0 1615.20841683 84% => OK
No of words: 276.0 315.596192385 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.91304347826 5.12529762239 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.07593519647 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.7585767801 2.80592935109 98% => OK
Unique words: 162.0 176.041082164 92% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.586956521739 0.561755894193 104% => OK
syllable_count: 425.7 506.74238477 84% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 31.0664610151 49.4020404114 63% => OK
Chars per sentence: 84.75 106.682146367 79% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.25 20.7667163134 83% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.25 7.06120827912 117% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 8.67935871743 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.263340751956 0.244688304435 108% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0813820579758 0.084324248473 97% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0902293030303 0.0667982634062 135% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.172202943291 0.151304729494 114% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0615705206218 0.056905535591 108% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.3 13.0946893788 79% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 62.68 50.2224549098 125% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 11.3001002004 77% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.9 12.4159519038 88% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.03 8.58950901804 93% => OK
difficult_words: 62.0 78.4519038076 79% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.