Some people think that children should aim to their best at what they doing. Others disagree. Discuss both views and give your own opinion.
The debate over whether children ought to maximize their potential to achieve their different goals has become a predominant issue in recent years. From my perspective, I am of the opinion that it is imperative for youngsters to put essential efforts in whatever they do.
On the one hand, there are several compelling reasons accounting for why some opponents suppose that children fail to target their best. One of the most plausible causes is to put offsprings at high risks of pressure. For instance, children who study for the sake of exceptional academic results are likely to squander a lot of time to immerse in set texts, which results in the shortage of time for exhilarating outdoor activities. Thus, the lack of playtime might lead to a deterioration in mental health problems such as stress or depression. Another possible reason is to require children’s autonomy without parental assistance. However, parents cannot allocate a whole day to supervise their offsprings, and therefore young children might lose interest in meeting their target.
On the other hand, others and I are convinced that targeting at the highest destination will bring about considerable merits to youngsters. First and foremost, what children could take advantage of from reaching their potential is to take in their ability. As a result, this will likely to provide them with a precious opportunity of making a wise decision in their career path, which results in moving up the ladder easier. In tandem with this, patience which is a key to success might be formulated if children aim at their best. This is because children will have to take time and conscientiousness to reach their goal, which intentionally sharpens children’s patience.
In conclusion, while others assert that it is unnecessary for young people to achieve the best result at their daily tasks, it is my firm conviction that aiming to the best is crucial for career prospects of the young generation.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-09-25 | Phuong1810 | 73 | view |
| 2023-09-25 | Phuong1810 | 73 | view |
| 2023-09-25 | Phuong1810 | 56 | view |
| 2023-07-05 | daikhanhs | 56 | view |
| 2023-07-05 | daikhanhs | 56 | view |
- In many countries today if people want to find work they have to move away from their families and friends Do you think the advantages of this development outweigh the disadvantages 78
- The research indicates that nowadays some consumers are less influenced by advertising than in the past What are the reasons and is it a positive or negative development 73
- The maps below show how the town of Harbone changes from 1936 to 2007 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 11
- The most effective way to solve the current traffic and pollution problems in cities is to encourage people to move from the suburbs or the countryside into the city centre To what extent do you agree or disagree 79
- Some people believe that school children should not be given homework by their teachers whereas others argue that homework plays an important role in the education of children Discuss both of these views and give your own opinion 84
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, however, if, so, therefore, thus, while, for instance, in conclusion, such as, as a result, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 10.4138276553 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 28.0 24.0651302605 116% => OK
Preposition: 53.0 41.998997996 126% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1647.0 1615.20841683 102% => OK
No of words: 321.0 315.596192385 102% => OK
Chars per words: 5.1308411215 5.12529762239 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.23278547379 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.89696511991 2.80592935109 103% => OK
Unique words: 189.0 176.041082164 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.588785046729 0.561755894193 105% => OK
syllable_count: 503.1 506.74238477 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 40.8618878364 49.4020404114 83% => OK
Chars per sentence: 117.642857143 106.682146367 110% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.9285714286 20.7667163134 110% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.28571428571 7.06120827912 117% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.237072022638 0.244688304435 97% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0803270092686 0.084324248473 95% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0496315396332 0.0667982634062 74% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.143358864262 0.151304729494 95% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0263855647578 0.056905535591 46% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.2 13.0946893788 108% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 50.2224549098 98% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.77 12.4159519038 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.06 8.58950901804 105% => OK
difficult_words: 88.0 78.4519038076 112% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.