Some people widely believe that children should stimulate to play outdoor games, which aids to enhance physical strength. However, others think that they should motivate to play more computer games. I agree with young children must play outdoor games owing to it has inevitable benefits for their health and social development. In this ensuing essay, I will illustrate both views in detail.
Those who in favour of outdoor games suggested that pupils can enhance physical strength. Despite not doing exercise, children can still improve their health by completing tasks in physical games namely cricket, football. For instance, the government survey states that because of having a routine of playing outdoor games, keen can raise their fitness.
Furthermore, outdoor games play a vital role in children's social growth and It's an opportunity for them to adopt crucial skills. Outdoor games allow children to learn about competition and teamwork, which is a significant skill consequently this would be convenient for them for social growth in terms of manage things. To illustration, The Times of India reported a child can learn about tough circumstances and the importance of decisions while playing outdoor games.
The most significant reason why others say that computer games are more important, children can update their ability to solve problems. If children can play computer graphic games, then they are able to upgrade their brain capacity to make strong strategies in order to solve problems. For example, the children's rights department highlighted that children become smarter to easily resolve any difficulties since they have played computer games.
In conclusion, outdoor games have more advantages for children such as they can strengthen their health. Additionally, it is key for pupils to adopt interpersonal skills. I also agree with this. However, due to playing computer games, children can refine their problem-solving technics.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, consequently, furthermore, however, if, so, still, then, while, for example, for instance, in conclusion, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 13.1623246493 38% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 7.85571142285 165% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 10.4138276553 38% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 29.0 24.0651302605 121% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 35.0 41.998997996 83% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1665.0 1615.20841683 103% => OK
No of words: 301.0 315.596192385 95% => OK
Chars per words: 5.53156146179 5.12529762239 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.16525528304 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.7151659499 2.80592935109 97% => OK
Unique words: 169.0 176.041082164 96% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.56146179402 0.561755894193 100% => OK
syllable_count: 487.8 506.74238477 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 40.433036614 49.4020404114 82% => OK
Chars per sentence: 97.9411764706 106.682146367 92% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.7058823529 20.7667163134 85% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.0 7.06120827912 99% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 16.0 8.67935871743 184% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.332175311537 0.244688304435 136% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.118557256975 0.084324248473 141% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0655773356822 0.0667982634062 98% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.209317125687 0.151304729494 138% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0683079608031 0.056905535591 120% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.5 13.0946893788 103% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 54.22 50.2224549098 108% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.3001002004 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.5 12.4159519038 117% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.57 8.58950901804 100% => OK
difficult_words: 78.0 78.4519038076 99% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 9.78957915832 66% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.