Some people think that cultural traditions will be destroyed if they are used as money-making attractions aimed at tourists. Others, however, believe that is the only way to save these traditions. Discuss both these views and give your own opinion.

Tourism revenue from traditional cultures, have become a heated topic of debate, some people belive that doing so will damage these tradition, while the others thinks that tourism can preserve these cultures from extinction. This essay will discuss the either side in detail and my point of view at the end.
Firstly, Few people are worried about the deteriorating effect of tourism on local cultures hence, these people strongly refuses the tourism involvement. Traditions and cultures were developed over centuries, which are icons of each society; insensible use of these assets can damage it's values and originality abruptly. Some sort of tourism uses things as a source of 'goods for sale', the sensitive cultural elements are often neglected, these makes negative notion in some people. For example, when traditional bamboo festival in karnataka, a state in India, become inflicted by tourism, local economy boosted but the life of the festival totally ruined.
On the otherhands, tourism and revenue can be the life blood for existence for some traditions traditions. Presently, people are mostly profit oriented, unlike ancient people they will not spent money to protect their traditions, but when getting benefit from these norms, certainly they will protect it. For example, Traditional boat race was local celebration from long before in kerala, was about to extinct, but timely involvement of government by including it as an icon of tourism took it in a new way. Now this celebration brings huge revenue income, besides people are actively involving in it.
From my perspectives, tourism could bring about potential changes in local cultures and traditions. Getting financial benefit and popularity will protect these traditions exponentially, or otherwise it will not get noticed well and may fade as time passes.

Votes
Average: 7.8 (1 vote)

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 127, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'this tradition' or 'these traditions'?
Suggestion: this tradition; these traditions
...people belive that doing so will damage these tradition, while the others thinks that tourism c...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 236, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ese cultures from extinction. This essay will discuss the either side in detail a...
^^
Line 3, column 85, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a word
Suggestion: traditions
...e the life blood for existence for some traditions traditions. Presently, people are mostly profit or...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 189, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[1]
Message: The verb 'will' requires the base form of the verb: 'spend'
Suggestion: spend
...ed, unlike ancient people they will not spent money to protect their traditions, but ...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 495, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in a new way" with adverb for "new"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
...luding it as an icon of tourism took it in a new way. Now this celebration brings huge reven...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 573, Rule ID: PROGRESSIVE_VERBS[1]
Message: This verb is normally not used in the progressive form. Try a simple form instead.
...ngs huge revenue income, besides people are actively involving in it. From my perspectives, tourism ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, but, first, firstly, hence, if, may, so, well, while, for example, sort of

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 22.0 24.0651302605 91% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 41.998997996 86% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1543.0 1615.20841683 96% => OK
No of words: 287.0 315.596192385 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.37630662021 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.11595363751 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.69968970273 2.80592935109 96% => OK
Unique words: 171.0 176.041082164 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.595818815331 0.561755894193 106% => OK
syllable_count: 497.7 506.74238477 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.809619238477 371% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 44.4268281059 49.4020404114 90% => OK
Chars per sentence: 128.583333333 106.682146367 121% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.9166666667 20.7667163134 115% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.91666666667 7.06120827912 98% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 5.01903807615 120% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.264304837343 0.244688304435 108% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0973249730893 0.084324248473 115% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0524446164989 0.0667982634062 79% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.166632905354 0.151304729494 110% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0328808038039 0.056905535591 58% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.9 13.0946893788 121% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 39.67 50.2224549098 79% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 11.3001002004 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.22 12.4159519038 115% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.56 8.58950901804 111% => OK
difficult_words: 87.0 78.4519038076 111% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 9.78957915832 143% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.