Some people think that good health is very important to every person so medical services should not be run by profit making companies Do the disadvantages of private health care outweigh the advantage

It is commonly believed that a top priority of everyone is to maintain a good fitness condition, therefore, medical service should not be provided by privately operated materialistic companies. Personally, I would argue that certain advantages of private health care can be eclipsed by its disadvantages.
On the positive side, the appearance of private health care facilities has brought about several benefits. Firstly, state hospitals are often overcrowded, therefore they are difficult to be organized and satisfy all patients. As a result, more and more residents select private clinics to be their health care destinations instead of wasting hours on extremely long waiting lists in public hospitals. Furthermore, with the high expense people paid for their treatment, they will experience state-of-the-art healing techniques with modern types of equipment such as laser surgery.
On the negative side, there are some drawbacks associated with private health care that should be taken into serious account. First of all, choosing a personal and immediate health treatment means patients must pay a much higher price compared to affordable one for public health services. This is because health companies usually offer contemporary treatments with up-to-date technology along with brilliant professors, who might not agree with a low payment for any operation. In addition, due to the difference in prices for particular therapies, wealthy patients can receive better services while the inferiors may not. To illustrate, in some private hospitals in Vietnam such as Viet Duc international hospital, a personal recovery room with full utilities is prepared for a patient who is willing to pay more whereas others will recover in a large social room.
In conclusion, I understand that private health services have lots of benefits. Nevertheless, I suppose that these advantages are outweighed by the drawbacks because of a range of exorbitant prices which leads to unequal treatments.

Votes
Average: 8.9 (1 vote)

Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, firstly, furthermore, if, may, nevertheless, so, therefore, whereas, while, i suppose, in addition, in conclusion, such as, as a result, first of all

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 10.4138276553 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 16.0 24.0651302605 66% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 41.998997996 100% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1688.0 1615.20841683 105% => OK
No of words: 303.0 315.596192385 96% => OK
Chars per words: 5.57095709571 5.12529762239 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.17215713816 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.02844441313 2.80592935109 108% => OK
Unique words: 194.0 176.041082164 110% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.640264026403 0.561755894193 114% => OK
syllable_count: 531.9 506.74238477 105% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 42.5303233278 49.4020404114 86% => OK
Chars per sentence: 129.846153846 106.682146367 122% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.3076923077 20.7667163134 112% => OK
Discourse Markers: 12.0 7.06120827912 170% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.27987592638 0.244688304435 114% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.101731601289 0.084324248473 121% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0645096880878 0.0667982634062 97% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.172021516231 0.151304729494 114% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0452580323785 0.056905535591 80% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.5 13.0946893788 126% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 31.21 50.2224549098 62% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.6 11.3001002004 129% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.32 12.4159519038 123% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.88 8.58950901804 115% => OK
difficult_words: 98.0 78.4519038076 125% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.