Some people think that the government is wasting money on the arts and this money could be better spent elsewhere.
To what extent do you agree or disagree?
It is argued that by some that spending money on the arts id unnecessary and government should fund this money on other sectors. In my opinion, I disagree with this statement because arts play crucial role for country even though some industries such as education and health are the most important.
Firstly, all nations express their culture by arts and it can be resource of incomes. Reason this is most tourists visit museums and go to music or dance concerts in order to learn different culture and tradition. For instance, the Indian government actively uses traditional arts forms to promote tourism in the country. India’s classical dances have fascinated audience all over the world and attract thousands of international tourists to the nation. Therefore, financing to improve arts has plenty of profits for economic advancement.
Secondly, arts allow people to relax, appreciate and even find their food. In other words, this sector creates many job positions namely singer, dancer, painter, decorator, sculptor etc. for example, in my country, The Mongolian State Academic Theater of drama has about 500 workers including artists and assistants. If government stop to give funding, not only those people will lost their job, but also audience will not have any exciting performances to enjoy. Hence, arts have positive impacts for both who do this and who watch this.
In conclusion, other expenditures are vital for country. Arts, however, has equally responsible for society and finance. Thus, allocating money on arts is not waste, conversely it is needed and brings merits.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 54, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'arts'' or 'art's'?
Suggestion: arts'; art's
...that by some that spending money on the arts id unnecessary and government should fu...
^^^^
Line 3, column 381, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[1]
Message: The verb 'will' requires the base form of the verb: 'lose'
Suggestion: lose
...ive funding, not only those people will lost their job, but also audience will not h...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, conversely, first, firstly, hence, however, if, second, secondly, so, therefore, thus, for example, for instance, in conclusion, such as, in my opinion, in other words
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 13.1623246493 53% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 10.4138276553 125% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 18.0 24.0651302605 75% => OK
Preposition: 26.0 41.998997996 62% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1348.0 1615.20841683 83% => OK
No of words: 254.0 315.596192385 80% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.30708661417 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.99216450694 4.20363070211 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.68073233887 2.80592935109 96% => OK
Unique words: 170.0 176.041082164 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.669291338583 0.561755894193 119% => OK
syllable_count: 412.2 506.74238477 81% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.2975951904 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 32.2685949837 49.4020404114 65% => OK
Chars per sentence: 89.8666666667 106.682146367 84% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.9333333333 20.7667163134 82% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.8666666667 7.06120827912 168% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.204723568257 0.244688304435 84% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.063126251739 0.084324248473 75% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.067477200131 0.0667982634062 101% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.12321829334 0.151304729494 81% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0678030427311 0.056905535591 119% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.0 13.0946893788 92% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 55.24 50.2224549098 110% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 11.3001002004 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.22 12.4159519038 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.59 8.58950901804 112% => OK
difficult_words: 83.0 78.4519038076 106% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.1190380762 83% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.