In the contemporary era, due to globalization, nations not only exchange goods and services but also culture and tradition. Although many of us comprehend this to be beneficial, others, on the contrary, argue that it diminishes the states unique identification. My appeal is that it has a mostly positive influence on the country. This essay keenly examines both the perceptions and in furtherance, shores up my opinion.
Firstly, let us put a light on the advantages. Despite numerous geographical and traditional barriers nations collaborate with each other for the fulfillment of their respective needs. This is undeniable as it plays a prominent role in the evolution of a state. Exporting excess goods enhances the economy and importing is always essential in coping up with enormous demand. This relation isn't just economical but also cultural as we embrace a variety of foreign trends and traditions eventually. For example, during emergencies like a fatal pandemic outbreak rich nations supply medical assistance to the poor ones helping them to overcome the grim situation. Thus, it is necessary for the states to compliment each other for better growth.
Now, we hurtle towards the drawbacks. In contrast to the above discussion, some citizens perceive this as disruption of their long appreciated heritage and identity crisis. It is debated that the infiltration of external traditions contaminates their antique culture. Moreover, it also brings a sense of superiority for the nation contributing the most over the rest of them. For example, some countries exploit the natural resources of others in the name of the business. In this way, there exist some grim effects too.
summarizing the issue, it can be estimated that this has both benefits as well as negatives. In the end, it is obvious that the advantages overshadow the shortcomings. so, it can be declared that collaboration between different nations is advantageous to a large extent.
- It is better to save money than to spend it How far do you agree with this statement Is saving more important than spending in today s world Give reasons for your answer and provide ideas and examples from your own You should spend about 40 minutes on thi 80
- Should wealthy nations be required to share their wealth among poorer nations by providing such things as food and education Or is it the responsibility of the governments of poorer nations to look after their citizens themselves 78
- Many people find it difficult to speak in front of and to present to an audience It is believed that this skill should be taught in school Why is this important To what extent do you agree or disagree with it 56
- Scientists believe computers will become more intelligent than human beings Some people think the development have a positive impact others think it is negative To what extend do you agree or disagree 84
- Nowadays people are spending more time in workplace and staying away from home for work Discuss its advantages and disadvantages with your own experiences 71
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 390, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: isn't
... up with enormous demand. This relation isnt just economical but also cultural as we...
^^^^
Line 7, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Summarizing
..., there exist some grim effects too. summarizing the issue, it can be estimated that thi...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 72, Rule ID: BOTH_AS_WELL_AS[1]
Message: Probable usage error. Use 'and' after 'both'.
Suggestion: and
...e estimated that this has both benefits as well as negatives. In the end, it is obvious th...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 169, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: So
...advantages overshadow the shortcomings. so, it can be declared that collaboration ...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, if, moreover, so, thus, well, for example, in contrast, as well as, in contrast to, on the contrary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 7.85571142285 25% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 33.0 24.0651302605 137% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 38.0 41.998997996 90% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 8.3376753507 168% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1656.0 1615.20841683 103% => OK
No of words: 311.0 315.596192385 99% => OK
Chars per words: 5.32475884244 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.19942759058 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.08899641692 2.80592935109 110% => OK
Unique words: 189.0 176.041082164 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.607717041801 0.561755894193 108% => OK
syllable_count: 528.3 506.74238477 104% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 11.0 5.43587174349 202% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 16.0721442886 124% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 20.2975951904 74% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 32.7305285628 49.4020404114 66% => OK
Chars per sentence: 82.8 106.682146367 78% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.55 20.7667163134 75% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.3 7.06120827912 89% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.01903807615 80% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 8.67935871743 150% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.147538709221 0.244688304435 60% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0385436991493 0.084324248473 46% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.033404219528 0.0667982634062 50% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0821524032992 0.151304729494 54% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0287279600868 0.056905535591 50% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.4 13.0946893788 87% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 47.79 50.2224549098 95% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.3001002004 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.28 12.4159519038 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.12 8.58950901804 118% => OK
difficult_words: 113.0 78.4519038076 144% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 9.78957915832 77% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.1190380762 79% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.