It is argued that instead of prolonging the fight against climate change, learning to adapt to this global issue will be more effective for humanity. Even though co-existence with tribulation is effective to some extent, I strongly believe that it would be better if people stood up to overcome this problem.
On the one hand, finding ways to harmonize climate change is a logical thought at this point. The reasons for this may include the lack of patience and human rapid adaptation. Regarding the former, people have felt too depressed and tired of discovering ways to resist the constant change of weather but that did not bring the desired effect. As for the latter, it is thought that climate change is not entirely irritating to humans. For example, it is reported that the global temperature has risen to approximately 60 Celcius degrees in the last decade, but the number of deaths recorded remains under 100, which shows the constant adaptation to climate change of human beings.
On the other hand, I am of the opinion that it is certain that in the future living with climate change will no longer work and people must stand up and fight it. First of all, life on earth and humans will be threatened because climate change will cause many other catastrophic disasters that will shorten the life of the earth and affect human lives. For instance, more and more land, and trees are destroyed, and the sea level rise suddenly engulfs the land. In addition, joining hands together to prevent climate change between countries helps to increase solidarity and education. Ultimately, finding ways to tackle this global problem will help people develop skills to deal with more devastating disasters later on. For example, the development of cooperation skills and survival skills.
In conclusion, while accepting climate change is a good idea, I affirm that stopping it will be the best solution for the future.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, if, may, regarding, so, while, as for, for example, for instance, in addition, in conclusion, first of all, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 10.4138276553 125% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 24.0 24.0651302605 100% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 41.998997996 100% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1605.0 1615.20841683 99% => OK
No of words: 321.0 315.596192385 102% => OK
Chars per words: 5.0 5.12529762239 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.23278547379 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.53545046098 2.80592935109 90% => OK
Unique words: 179.0 176.041082164 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.557632398754 0.561755894193 99% => OK
syllable_count: 493.2 506.74238477 97% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.809619238477 371% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 45.6186499635 49.4020404114 92% => OK
Chars per sentence: 114.642857143 106.682146367 107% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.9285714286 20.7667163134 110% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.78571428571 7.06120827912 139% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.210416808824 0.244688304435 86% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.073863480626 0.084324248473 88% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0507691869894 0.0667982634062 76% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.119001986409 0.151304729494 79% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0341323722931 0.056905535591 60% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.6 13.0946893788 104% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 57.61 50.2224549098 115% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.02 12.4159519038 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.81 8.58950901804 103% => OK
difficult_words: 83.0 78.4519038076 106% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.