There can be no doubt that every people have a universal right to receive the best health care. While this idea is a worthy aim, I argue that it is impractical for authorities to implement such a policy.
On the one hand, it is not utopian to expect that governments would fund the optimal medical care for people from all walks of life. First, medicine is one of the social aspects which are mainly improved by citizens’ money. No matter where they live, people have to contribute to general improvements in their nations through some kinds of taxes. Therefore, there could be the fact that residents have the right to enjoy all levels of healthcare with no fee. Second, without governments’ supports, the poor are unlikely to access to the best care when they get any illnesses. For example, low-income patients have suffered severe chronic diseases or even died a painful death because they cannot afford treatment costs.
On the other hand, funding free top-class healthcare would be an enormous strain on political systems in any countries. First of all, apart from this field, governments have to pay their priority on other aspects to develop comprehensively. While fees for high-quality care at hospitals are enormously expensive, if governments have responsibility for these payments, it will mean less money to spend on other significant issues such as education or environmental protection. Furthermore, when any health services are free for everyone, they will ask for their right excessively. That will lead to an unforeseeable problem that essential cares are out of reach of those who seriously need and vice versa. However, every patient with different diseases demands specific medical care, so all are not necessary to receive the best ones.
In conclusion, despite undoubtedly significant advantages from free healthcare, I hold the view that governments will find it challenging to make it real. It is highly believed in cooperation between authorities with citizens to share costs regarding medical services.
- Some say that advertisements of toys and snacks have a huge impact on children and their parents and therefore advertising to children should be banned Do you agree or disagree with the statement Give your own opinion 78
- The table shows the expenditure on various types of food in one European country in 1992 2002 and 2012 The amount spent on various foodstuffs in Italy millions of euros 1992 2002 2012 Beef 45 43 54 Chicken 38 41 56 Butter margarine 8 9 8 Potatoes 11 14 18 64
- Some people say that the internet is making the world smaller by bringing together To what extent do you agree that the internet is making it easier for people to communicate with one another 89
- The charts below show degrees granted in different fields at the National University in the years 1990 2000 and 2010 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
- The two maps below show an island before and after the construction of some tourist facilities 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 139, Rule ID: ALLOW_TO[1]
Message: Did you mean 'making'? Or maybe you should add a pronoun? In active voice, 'challenge' + 'to' takes an object, usually a pronoun.
Suggestion: making
...at governments will find it challenging to make it real. It is highly believed in coope...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, furthermore, however, if, regarding, second, so, therefore, while, apart from, for example, in conclusion, no doubt, such as, first of all, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 10.4138276553 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 12.0 7.30460921844 164% => OK
Pronoun: 26.0 24.0651302605 108% => OK
Preposition: 44.0 41.998997996 105% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1710.0 1615.20841683 106% => OK
No of words: 327.0 315.596192385 104% => OK
Chars per words: 5.22935779817 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.25242769721 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.92016105237 2.80592935109 104% => OK
Unique words: 199.0 176.041082164 113% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.608562691131 0.561755894193 108% => OK
syllable_count: 536.4 506.74238477 106% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 31.9637856605 49.4020404114 65% => OK
Chars per sentence: 106.875 106.682146367 100% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.4375 20.7667163134 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.5625 7.06120827912 150% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 8.67935871743 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.144253756542 0.244688304435 59% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.04772578784 0.084324248473 57% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0407801150725 0.0667982634062 61% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0892124674199 0.151304729494 59% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.018454878288 0.056905535591 32% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.4 13.0946893788 102% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 50.2224549098 102% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.05 12.4159519038 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.88 8.58950901804 103% => OK
difficult_words: 88.0 78.4519038076 112% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.