Some people think the most important thing about being rich is that it gives a person an opportunity to help other people. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
All have witnessed rich people such as Bill Gates or Mark Zuckerberg spend millions of dollars on helping others, but the notion of whether wealthy individuals will likely sacrifice their needs is extremely controversial. In my opinion, I agree with both terms.
Rich individuals tend to assist other people because they are conscious that with the same amount of expenditure, other people will use it more productively. For instance, within 5 dollars you can buy a pre-made burger, while if you spend it accurately, you can produce a whole family meal. If we look at a higher amount of money, an eight-hundred-dollar phone is equal to a 1-year meal of starving children. Consequently, if wealthy individuals have a second thought about this before buying luxurious goods, they would certainly decide to help others instead. However, it comes down to a person’s empathy and compassion. One would be more likely to provide if they had been through tragedy and poverty themselves. This gave people the urge and motive to support because it is a powerful reflection of their former selves. Moreover, with this particular group of people, they will have a fulfilling and nostalgic feeling thinking that the happiness on this person's face would have been theirs if someone had lent them a hand.
On the contrary, their needs are directly proportional to their wealth. One becomes greedier when he has more money since ambitions and cupidity have no limitations. So, the question is not whether this person will help, but how many among the rich individuals are willing to assist the unfortunate ones. A recent survey surprisingly announced that only 7% among the prosperous individuals remembered helping other people. However, it is only a common psychology perspective that humans will think of themselves first. In the world of immensely developed convenience, these individuals deserved to have their fortune because most were diligent and talented, whereas some unfortunate ones complained and worried but they did not try their best to keep up with the pace.
In conclusion, this argumentative notion covers both facets and people in society. Regarding the reason why people decided to help others or not, it is necessary to research deeper before disagreeing with this individual’s behavior.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, consequently, first, however, if, look, moreover, regarding, second, so, whereas, while, for instance, in conclusion, such as, in my opinion, on the contrary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 10.4138276553 125% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 40.0 24.0651302605 166% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 45.0 41.998997996 107% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.3376753507 48% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1992.0 1615.20841683 123% => OK
No of words: 372.0 315.596192385 118% => OK
Chars per words: 5.35483870968 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.39173103935 4.20363070211 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.03857155589 2.80592935109 108% => OK
Unique words: 223.0 176.041082164 127% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.599462365591 0.561755894193 107% => OK
syllable_count: 603.9 506.74238477 119% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 11.0 5.43587174349 202% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 78.3779903736 49.4020404114 159% => OK
Chars per sentence: 124.5 106.682146367 117% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.25 20.7667163134 112% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.125 7.06120827912 143% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.18802042627 0.244688304435 77% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.059575401164 0.084324248473 71% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0328940977486 0.0667982634062 49% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.111584814557 0.151304729494 74% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0290760860132 0.056905535591 51% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.4 13.0946893788 118% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.13 50.2224549098 96% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.05 12.4159519038 113% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.11 8.58950901804 106% => OK
difficult_words: 102.0 78.4519038076 130% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.