Some people believe that educational institutes should inculcate several fun and entertainment activities, while others assert that the only purpose of these institutes is to provide education. I concur with the former notion and will provide some relevant examples to further explain this viewpoint.
Firstly, involvement in several enjoyable activities improves the various skills of a student, such as cognitive skills, spatial skills, and active skills. This is because children need to brainstorm among numerous options available, and have to reach a quick decision. For example, students playing team games like football or basketball requires a rapid decision-making process, and they will perform several permutations in their minds within seconds to predict the next action. To contrast this, studying only the curriculum monotonous books will hamper the personal growth of a child.
Secondly, nowadays, children are intrigued by digital visual aids, which assist in a better understanding of the lessons. This is due to the fact that watching a lesson attracts the concentration and leave imprints on the students’ mind to retain this knowledge for a longer time. A recent experiment conducted by the National Education Institute of Mumbai demonstrated that the use of visual aids in the classrooms has drastically improved the overall academic performance. Teaching in this manner has benefitted even the slowest students.
To conclude, I advocate that the purpose of the schools should not only be limited to education because it hinders the mental and physical growth of a child. School Authorities should try to manage an equilibrium in order to enhance the personality of a student.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 66, Rule ID: MANY_NN_U[8]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun fun seems to be uncountable; consider using: 'some fun'.
Suggestion: some fun
...educational institutes should inculcate several fun and entertainment activities, while oth...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, firstly, second, secondly, so, while, for example, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 13.1623246493 38% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 17.0 24.0651302605 71% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 41.998997996 81% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1451.0 1615.20841683 90% => OK
No of words: 261.0 315.596192385 83% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.55938697318 5.12529762239 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.0193898071 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.00268275011 2.80592935109 107% => OK
Unique words: 171.0 176.041082164 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.655172413793 0.561755894193 117% => OK
syllable_count: 444.6 506.74238477 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.809619238477 371% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 42.7713559393 49.4020404114 87% => OK
Chars per sentence: 120.916666667 106.682146367 113% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.75 20.7667163134 105% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.41666666667 7.06120827912 77% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.101659348823 0.244688304435 42% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0334473965501 0.084324248473 40% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0361356869798 0.0667982634062 54% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0642880021931 0.151304729494 42% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0471080337095 0.056905535591 83% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.6 13.0946893788 119% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 41.7 50.2224549098 83% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.97 12.4159519038 121% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.67 8.58950901804 124% => OK
difficult_words: 99.0 78.4519038076 126% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.