People have differing views regard to the question of how to make our road safer. While I accept that punishments partly create a positive effect on traffic habitants, I would argue that there are some negative impact of these rigid rules. In my opinion, utilize both punishment and a range of the other measure would be more effective in proving drivers ’s behaviour.
In the other hand, strict punishments might help to promote safety in driving habits. In this situation penalties play the role as a deterrent, which could be could be understand to people avoid making same offence. My brother, for instance, was punished because he forgot to wear helmet while driving through crossroad. Since then, I have never seen him without a helmet when travelling by motorbike anymore. Constructed a traffic law system for bad behaviour could also make drivers aware that their activities minus consequences. However, this method of reducing traffic accidents would lead to a negative effect as dissatisfaction of citizens. As a result, many penalized people could catch anger and lose mind control, and violent battle between police and residents happen recently. In addition, although punishments rooted in a positive idea, a part of traffic police using this thing to take unfair advantage like earning illegal money from citizens.
In the other hand, there are several ways that government could utilize as possible as decreases the ratio of traffic offences without using penalties. Firstly, the suggestion of opening a short term of free training courses for citizens is the beneficial idea to improve sense of civic responsibility, Meanwhile, government should advertise the harm of driving carelessly and encourage the advantages of obeying the law simultaneously.
In conclusion, while penalties can help to prevent bad driving, I believe that other road safety measures should also be introduced.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 87, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...lp to promote safety in driving habits. In this situation penalties play the role ...
^^
Line 3, column 151, Rule ID: PHRASE_REPETITION[1]
Message: This phrase is duplicated. You should probably leave only 'could be'.
Suggestion: could be
...ies play the role as a deterrent, which could be could be understand to people avoid making same ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, firstly, however, if, so, then, while, for instance, in addition, in conclusion, as a result, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 13.1623246493 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 7.85571142285 153% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 10.4138276553 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 19.0 24.0651302605 79% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 41.998997996 93% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1616.0 1615.20841683 100% => OK
No of words: 301.0 315.596192385 95% => OK
Chars per words: 5.36877076412 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.16525528304 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.8188619931 2.80592935109 100% => OK
Unique words: 187.0 176.041082164 106% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.621262458472 0.561755894193 111% => OK
syllable_count: 510.3 506.74238477 101% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 2.10420841683 238% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 48.8195866514 49.4020404114 99% => OK
Chars per sentence: 115.428571429 106.682146367 108% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.5 20.7667163134 104% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.57142857143 7.06120827912 121% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.9879759519 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.298105516256 0.244688304435 122% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0910311874924 0.084324248473 108% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0637251295196 0.0667982634062 95% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.167644527129 0.151304729494 111% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0797703928245 0.056905535591 140% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.6 13.0946893788 111% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 41.7 50.2224549098 83% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.87 12.4159519038 112% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.4 8.58950901804 109% => OK
difficult_words: 90.0 78.4519038076 115% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.