People have different views regard to the question of how to make our road safer. While I accept that punishments partly create a positive effect on traffic habitants, I would argue that there are some negative impacts of these rigid rules. In my opinion, utilize both punishments and a range of the other measures would be more effective in proving drivers ’s behaviour.
On the other hand, strict punishments might help to promote safety in driving habits. In this situation penalties play the role as a deterrent, which could be understand to people avoid making same offence. My brother, for instance, was punished because he forgot to wear helmet while driving through crossroad. Since then, I have never seen him without a helmet when travelling by motorbike anymore. Constructed a traffic law system for bad behaviour could also make drivers aware that their activities minus consequences. However, this method of reducing traffic accidents would lead to a negative effect as dissatisfaction of citizens. As a result, many penalized people could catch anger and lose mind control, and violent battles between polices and residents happen recently. In addition, although punishments rooted in a positive idea, a part of traffic police are using this thing to take unfair advantages like earning illegal money from citizens.
On the other hand, there are several ways that government could utilize as well as decreases the ratio of traffic offences without using penalties. Firstly, the suggestion of opening a short term of free training courses for citizens is the beneficial idea to improve sense of civic responsibility. Meanwhile, government should propagate the harm of driving carelessly and encourage the advantages of obeying the law simultaneously.
In conclusion, while penalties can help to prevent bad driving, I believe that other road safety measures should also be introduced.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, firstly, however, if, so, then, well, while, for instance, in addition, in conclusion, as a result, as well as, in my opinion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 13.1623246493 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 10.4138276553 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 19.0 24.0651302605 79% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 41.998997996 93% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1614.0 1615.20841683 100% => OK
No of words: 300.0 315.596192385 95% => OK
Chars per words: 5.38 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.16179145029 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.83470555006 2.80592935109 101% => OK
Unique words: 185.0 176.041082164 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.616666666667 0.561755894193 110% => OK
syllable_count: 508.5 506.74238477 100% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 2.10420841683 238% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 26.5773504239 49.4020404114 54% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 107.6 106.682146367 101% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.0 20.7667163134 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.4666666667 7.06120827912 148% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.9879759519 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.297640223638 0.244688304435 122% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0853187592277 0.084324248473 101% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0643329625787 0.0667982634062 96% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.166781219707 0.151304729494 110% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0798242940076 0.056905535591 140% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.9 13.0946893788 106% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.72 50.2224549098 85% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.92 12.4159519038 112% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.31 8.58950901804 108% => OK
difficult_words: 89.0 78.4519038076 113% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 9.78957915832 77% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.