Some people who have been in prison become good citizens later, and it is often argued that these are the best people to talk to students about the dangers of committing a crime.
To what extent do you agree or disagree?
In recent years, it has been claimed that some criminals are able to become productive members of our society. That is why, some people argue that ex-prisoners should talk to pupils regarding the risks of braking the law. Personally, I believe that an interaction between rehabilitated offenders and pupils should happen because it would reduce the criminality rate and will illustrate the difficulty of rehabilitation.
To begin, the main reason for the extremely high level juvenile delinquency is the peer pressure. It is needless to say that a major number of minor offenses are being done by youngsters only in order to get accepted by those close their age. For example, children with low self-esteem may do anything to gain the friendship from others. Thus, the only way to eliminate the phenomenon of peer pressure is to show the negative effects that illegal activities have and the best to do this is people who have been arrested for their crimes.
In addition to this, former prisoners could present the challenges of the rehabilitation process to pupils. First of all, there is no denying that the vast majority of prisoners would be stigmatized and will face discrimination after their release. Unfortunately, the potential of finding an occupation is significantly low, which may lead them to thefts or other illegal activities again. Consequently, having a person who has been through horrible situations after prison and has become a valuable member in the society would prevent teenagers from committing crimes.
To sum up, the debate whether former prisoners should be close to students has been a controversial issue. However, it is my firm belief that allowing a few precious school hours for discussions between ex prisoners and students would prevent them from illegal activities.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
consequently, first, however, if, may, regarding, so, thus, for example, in addition, first of all, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 13.1623246493 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 7.85571142285 153% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 7.30460921844 151% => OK
Pronoun: 23.0 24.0651302605 96% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 41.998997996 93% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1528.0 1615.20841683 95% => OK
No of words: 291.0 315.596192385 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.25085910653 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.13022058845 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.94076971187 2.80592935109 105% => OK
Unique words: 177.0 176.041082164 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.60824742268 0.561755894193 108% => OK
syllable_count: 474.3 506.74238477 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 35.9735274133 49.4020404114 73% => OK
Chars per sentence: 117.538461538 106.682146367 110% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.3846153846 20.7667163134 108% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.38461538462 7.06120827912 119% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 8.67935871743 12% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 12.0 3.9879759519 301% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.187186605016 0.244688304435 77% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.060785661937 0.084324248473 72% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0644457406144 0.0667982634062 96% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.103590456925 0.151304729494 68% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0184987612398 0.056905535591 33% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.5 13.0946893788 111% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 50.2224549098 98% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.47 12.4159519038 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.85 8.58950901804 103% => OK
difficult_words: 76.0 78.4519038076 97% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.