While some people believe that it is effective to work for the same company, others prefer the benefits gain from working for unrelated organizations. The current essay discusses both sides and reach a relevant conclusion for such scenario.
To begin with, people who tend to be keen on sticking to one specific occupation will have a chance to get a higher position promotion, due to the loyalty which has been proved yearly. As a result, these workers have a high reputation in their employments and it will be a big bonus in case they shift to another related aspect company. Furthermore, this group will have a guarantee in the retire insurance, also their pensions, according to their contributions to the company. Lastly, people feel comfortable and do not take any nagging worries about their employments.
On the other hand, for employees who prefer jumping in various types of jobs to sticking at their main aspects, they may have a high salary in order to improve their living standards. Also, this type of people has the advantages in working in a dynamic environment, creativity and they are able to adapt changes, which is one of the most important factor to survive in any competitions. However, when people getting older, several risks will be occurred. Firstly, they may have to encounter to the low pension, due to their lack of contributions. Secondly, their trustworthy to the boss is almost non-existed, therefore, a chance for promotion is considered as low.
In short, among the two opinions in types of occupation, I fully support on working for the related organization, because of its stability mentioned above.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 386, Rule ID: A_INFINITVE[1]
Message: Probably a wrong construction: a/the + infinitive
...re, this group will have a guarantee in the retire insurance, also their pensions, accordi...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, furthermore, however, if, lastly, may, second, secondly, so, therefore, while, in short, as a result, to begin with, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 10.4138276553 38% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 20.0 24.0651302605 83% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 41.998997996 100% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1370.0 1615.20841683 85% => OK
No of words: 272.0 315.596192385 86% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.03676470588 5.12529762239 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.06108636974 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.88376878491 2.80592935109 103% => OK
Unique words: 166.0 176.041082164 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.610294117647 0.561755894193 109% => OK
syllable_count: 431.1 506.74238477 85% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 41.7469227076 49.4020404114 85% => OK
Chars per sentence: 114.166666667 106.682146367 107% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.6666666667 20.7667163134 109% => OK
Discourse Markers: 13.4166666667 7.06120827912 190% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.2651543116 0.244688304435 108% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0918702566778 0.084324248473 109% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0885096491467 0.0667982634062 133% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.179483410557 0.151304729494 119% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.107550591655 0.056905535591 189% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.6 13.0946893788 104% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 50.2224549098 98% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.25 12.4159519038 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.49 8.58950901804 110% => OK
difficult_words: 82.0 78.4519038076 105% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 9.78957915832 138% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.