Some people work for the same organization all their working life. Others think that it is better to work for different organizations. Discuss both these views and give your own opinion.
Nowadays, people employment in many institutions and majority of people work different organizations. While I disagree with the idea of working all their life in same organizations, I do believe that work for different institutions could benefit to people.
There are several reasons why people work for the same organizations all their working life. Firstly, their salaries gradually increased and it can benefit for their family. Secondly, they may be promoted within the organisation. Consequently, people achieve more rewards. Then when they work their boss experienced staff can be trusted with more responsibility and their boss can believe that this kind of workers leads to more benefit for the company. Finally, they become part if a team and they have a good pension and health insurance this can be given in the end of working life or when they work very well.
I believe that better to work for different organizations such as: Apple, Samsung, Xiomi or other popular companies in the world. People often can change jobs in order further their opportunities. Another company may offer a promotion or a higher salary and it is helpful and useful. When people change jobs can learn more experience. For instance, people can learn to do more their work helpful than initial. In addition, they learn different skills for working to many organisations and these experinces can help in one of many situations on life.
In conclusion, my view is that to work for different organizations have more advantages and it is better than to work for the same organization all their working life.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 285, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “When” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...er salary and it is helpful and useful. When people change jobs can learn more exper...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
consequently, finally, first, firstly, if, may, second, secondly, so, then, well, while, for instance, in addition, in conclusion, kind of, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 13.1623246493 53% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 29.0 24.0651302605 121% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 24.0 41.998997996 57% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1339.0 1615.20841683 83% => OK
No of words: 262.0 315.596192385 83% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.1106870229 5.12529762239 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.02323427807 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.88050630792 2.80592935109 103% => OK
Unique words: 129.0 176.041082164 73% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.492366412214 0.561755894193 88% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 418.5 506.74238477 83% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 44.4709143398 49.4020404114 90% => OK
Chars per sentence: 89.2666666667 106.682146367 84% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.4666666667 20.7667163134 84% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.8 7.06120827912 139% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 8.67935871743 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.475752793621 0.244688304435 194% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.187521649134 0.084324248473 222% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.174332966351 0.0667982634062 261% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.374851215691 0.151304729494 248% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.12740766393 0.056905535591 224% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.4 13.0946893788 87% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 54.22 50.2224549098 108% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.3001002004 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.06 12.4159519038 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.79 8.58950901804 91% => OK
difficult_words: 55.0 78.4519038076 70% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 9.78957915832 77% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.