Some people work for the same organization all their working life. Others believe it is better to work for different organizations. Discuss both views and give your opinion.
Many people believe that having a stable job at the same company is more beneficial compared to switching numerous places. From my perspective, although both working methods have their own merits, whether workers choose, there is no huge difference.
On the one hand, remaining at a single company provides a broad range of advantages. Firstly, employees being exposed to a familiar culture will cooperate with their colleagues, which helps them have more similarities in ideas and strategies, leading to the increase of productivity. For instance, if arguments take place among campanions, they are capable of how to cope well with. Secondly, the operation and the system of organization could be understood completely by older staff because they contribute greatly to business for a long-term period. Therefore, senior employees tend to be chosen to work as a manager thanks to their abundant experience and skillfulness in most companies.
On the other hand, having opportunities to work for various organizations also offers a variety of merits. The first benefit is that working for different professional environments allows workers to diverse several skills such as problem-solving skills or communicative skills. This means that people can manage and find solutions for complex or unexpected situations. As a result, the candidates could be highly evaluated through their performance in the workplace. Another benefit is that job hopping is the best way for workers to expand their relationship with others. For example, if they have struggle with their tasks, they will receive the support from former companians as well as current ones.
In conclusion, both given options have their own benefits. Whether to work for a single enterprise or to employ in numerous companies, workers should make up their mind for an adequate working place, be determined and committed to their jobs.
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 600, Rule ID: HAVE_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Use past participle here: 'struggled'.
Suggestion: struggled
... with others. For example, if they have struggle with their tasks, they will receive the...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, if, second, secondly, so, therefore, well, for example, for instance, in conclusion, such as, as a result, as well as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 20.0 24.0651302605 83% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 41.998997996 90% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1606.0 1615.20841683 99% => OK
No of words: 296.0 315.596192385 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.42567567568 5.12529762239 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.14784890444 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.98284601401 2.80592935109 106% => OK
Unique words: 185.0 176.041082164 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.625 0.561755894193 111% => OK
syllable_count: 490.5 506.74238477 97% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 38.6779293942 49.4020404114 78% => OK
Chars per sentence: 107.066666667 106.682146367 100% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.7333333333 20.7667163134 95% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.8666666667 7.06120827912 154% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 8.67935871743 150% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.30281839974 0.244688304435 124% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0949203548625 0.084324248473 113% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0709131255344 0.0667982634062 106% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.189771785879 0.151304729494 125% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0595219661369 0.056905535591 105% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.0 13.0946893788 107% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.73 50.2224549098 87% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.21 12.4159519038 114% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.75 8.58950901804 114% => OK
difficult_words: 97.0 78.4519038076 124% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 600, Rule ID: HAVE_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Use past participle here: 'struggled'.
Suggestion: struggled
... with others. For example, if they have struggle with their tasks, they will receive the...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, if, second, secondly, so, therefore, well, for example, for instance, in conclusion, such as, as a result, as well as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 20.0 24.0651302605 83% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 41.998997996 90% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1606.0 1615.20841683 99% => OK
No of words: 296.0 315.596192385 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.42567567568 5.12529762239 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.14784890444 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.98284601401 2.80592935109 106% => OK
Unique words: 185.0 176.041082164 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.625 0.561755894193 111% => OK
syllable_count: 490.5 506.74238477 97% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 38.6779293942 49.4020404114 78% => OK
Chars per sentence: 107.066666667 106.682146367 100% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.7333333333 20.7667163134 95% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.8666666667 7.06120827912 154% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 8.67935871743 150% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.30281839974 0.244688304435 124% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0949203548625 0.084324248473 113% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0709131255344 0.0667982634062 106% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.189771785879 0.151304729494 125% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0595219661369 0.056905535591 105% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.0 13.0946893788 107% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.73 50.2224549098 87% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.21 12.4159519038 114% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.75 8.58950901804 114% => OK
difficult_words: 97.0 78.4519038076 124% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.