Some say that people living in high-rise apartments are lonely and unhappy, while others say that it’s advantageous to stay in high-rise apartments. Discuss both views and give your opinion.

Since the second half of the last century, there has been a switch from traditional houses with big yards to tall skyscrapers. Some people opine that loneliness and depression are more vivid in people living in a high-rise building, others believe that people derive many benefits from living in towers as they provide ample of modern facilities. I strongly believe that there are many good sides to staying in tall buildings.
On the one hand, living in tall constructions is very beneficial. Firstly, this type of accommodation provides a high-class lifestyle by offering various facilities such as gyms, swimming pools or community clubs which can entertain all residents. Having a gym in your building, in particular, enables you to exercise whenever you want. Secondly, high-rise apartments are located in the central part of cities which are all surrounded by a variety of public transportation, shopping centers, and restaurants. With better access to transportation and restaurants, condominiums attract lots of people to live there. For example, my apartment is only 5 minutes' walk to both the subway and central bus station.
On the other hand, the disadvantages of this lifestyle are also varied. It is common that persons in these houses live alone and even do not communicate with their neighbors, and more importantly, they are not allowed to keep a pet. Even if the association has no rule banning pets in the apartment complex, taking your dog down for a walk becomes cumbersome if you live on the higher floors of the building. So, consecutively sadness and loneliness are behind their walls. Additionally, if the building is flush, installing air conditioners and maintaining air conditioners, repairing a leaking pipeline becomes very difficult. In these cases, technicians and plumbers have to install scaffolding and risk their lives to attend to minor repairs. Consequently, your common area maintenance bill may become very high.
In conclusion, there are convincing arguments both for and against living in high-rise apartments, but I believe that there is a wealth of satisfaction in living in tall residential apartments.

Votes
Average: 8.9 (1 vote)

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 195, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... living in tall residential apartments.
^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, first, firstly, if, may, second, secondly, so, for example, in conclusion, in particular, such as, on the other hand

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 7.85571142285 25% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 10.4138276553 125% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 24.0 24.0651302605 100% => OK
Preposition: 48.0 41.998997996 114% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1812.0 1615.20841683 112% => OK
No of words: 341.0 315.596192385 108% => OK
Chars per words: 5.3137829912 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.29722995808 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.10059026852 2.80592935109 111% => OK
Unique words: 205.0 176.041082164 116% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.601173020528 0.561755894193 107% => OK
syllable_count: 561.6 506.74238477 111% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.809619238477 371% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 49.5452678266 49.4020404114 100% => OK
Chars per sentence: 106.588235294 106.682146367 100% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.0588235294 20.7667163134 97% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.29411764706 7.06120827912 117% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.237593310408 0.244688304435 97% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0637940493138 0.084324248473 76% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.068227687768 0.0667982634062 102% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.156712320756 0.151304729494 104% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0538058178643 0.056905535591 95% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.6 13.0946893788 104% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 50.2224549098 102% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.52 12.4159519038 109% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.26 8.58950901804 108% => OK
difficult_words: 100.0 78.4519038076 127% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.