Some schools have restricted the use of mobile phones. Is this a positive development or a negative one?
As we are living in the era of technology, many schools around the world allow students to carry their personal phones to the campus. While it is evident that these devices play an important role in safety, connectedness and even learning, many schools have come to a decision to restrict the use of phones on campus. In my opinion, this is a positive step and can bring benefits not only academically but also physically and socially too.
Restricting phone use in the classroom itself can boost learning. This is because, students are more likely to be induced by having their phones aside. Without these devices, it would mean that fewer distractions for learners and teachers. When a student brings their phone in their pocket or bag, for instance, there is an irresistible impulse to check constantly for texts, social media updates. Even the most sharp-eyed teacher cannot prevent them from sneakily checking their messages or browsing irrelevant materials on the internet during the lesson. These countless distractions draw attention away from important educational matters and possibly wear down attention spans, which result in long-term effects on academic performance. Therefore, a blanket ban on phones during class free student from this compusive tendency and allow them to pay attention.
Furthermore, by forbidding the use of the phone outside the classroom, schools can expect improvements in student wellbeing. In fact, if phones are banned during recess and lunchtime, the student have no choice but to engage in a more meaningful and perhaps active way with their classmates. They could play games, sports, or simply having a talk with their fellows, such activities are far healthier than just sitting alone hunched over the screen for hours. Thus, without such mandatories imposed by the school, children are not able to draw the line on phone use. These social and physical merits are only achievable with strict mobile rules.
In conclusion, I personally believe that the use of mobile phones in schools should be limited, despite the indispensable role of phones in our modern lives. With solid boundaries and bans in some circumstances, students are able to gain a better concentration span, strengthen friendships and involve in a more dynamic and healthier activities.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-10-08 | ImranMurtaza | 84 | view |
| 2022-02-11 | Agus Ismansyah | 73 | view |
| 2022-02-11 | Agus Ismansyah | 73 | view |
| 2021-12-10 | Revivo Tulaseket | 61 | view |
| 2021-11-13 | teenieteens | 73 | view |
- Advertisements are becoming more and more common in everyday life Is it a positive or negative development 84
- In some parts of the world traditional festivals and celebrations have disappeared or are disappearing What problems is this causing What measures could be taken to counter this situation 65
- The qualities that help people reach success in modern life cannot be learned in university or other academic institutions To what extent do you agree or disagree 84
- Task 2 Some people believe that success in sports depends on physical ability Others believe that there are more important factors Discuss both views and give your own opinion 84
- In some countries some criminal trials in law courts are shown on television so that the general public can watch them Do the advantages outweigh the disadvantages 84
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, furthermore, if, so, then, therefore, thus, well, while, for instance, in conclusion, in fact, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 17.0 10.4138276553 163% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 27.0 24.0651302605 112% => OK
Preposition: 54.0 41.998997996 129% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1941.0 1615.20841683 120% => OK
No of words: 368.0 315.596192385 117% => OK
Chars per words: 5.27445652174 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.37987740619 4.20363070211 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.78896898572 2.80592935109 99% => OK
Unique words: 219.0 176.041082164 124% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.595108695652 0.561755894193 106% => OK
syllable_count: 593.1 506.74238477 117% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.76152304609 168% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 38.3221637606 49.4020404114 78% => OK
Chars per sentence: 114.176470588 106.682146367 107% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.6470588235 20.7667163134 104% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.0 7.06120827912 99% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.267657803206 0.244688304435 109% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0869745602539 0.084324248473 103% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0676365470691 0.0667982634062 101% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.169179383234 0.151304729494 112% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0342357912291 0.056905535591 60% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.2 13.0946893788 108% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 50.2224549098 100% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.29 12.4159519038 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.14 8.58950901804 106% => OK
difficult_words: 104.0 78.4519038076 133% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.