These days, online courses are provided as alternatives to conventional learning methods in some universities. While this trend might be adverse to some extent, it, in many cases, would be more beneficial than the traditional approach.
Since Internet-based courses are offered on online platforms such as Zoom, Google, and YouTube which could be utilized via computer or mobile devices, students would have access to the lectures regardless of place and time. This leads to learners' ability to study wherever they want to without going to a physical classroom. They, as a consequence, would save a significant amount of time. Perhaps one of the best examples of this would be my university. It, during the time of social distancing by virtue of the Covid-19 pandemic when citizens were encouraged to stay at home to avoid community transfer, provided students with an online curriculum through software called Trans to approach the lessons at home. Granted, this method might minimize face-to-face interaction between students and their lecturers. They, however, could get in touch with one another by micro and camera utilization to enhance community when exchanging information.
Moreover, online courses are substantially more attractive than offline ones, which results from the contribution of illustrations and sounds. The application of these would keep students not fed up which makes the lessons more effective. When it comes to this, my teacher would be a good case in point. She combined images, videos, and games in her online courses in order that her students were more interactive instead of feeling drowsy like before. Admittedly, these might take a long time to prepare but this obstacle could be dealt with by lecture-maker software such as Canva, Quizizz, and Adobe Presenter.
In conclusion, for the aforementioned reasons, I believe offering internet-based alternatives would be a beneficial tendency.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, if, moreover, so, while, in conclusion, such as, in many cases
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 7.85571142285 165% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 19.0 24.0651302605 79% => OK
Preposition: 48.0 41.998997996 114% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1636.0 1615.20841683 101% => OK
No of words: 299.0 315.596192385 95% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.47157190635 5.12529762239 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.1583189471 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.99668537969 2.80592935109 107% => OK
Unique words: 185.0 176.041082164 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.61872909699 0.561755894193 110% => OK
syllable_count: 518.4 506.74238477 102% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 2.10420841683 238% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 3.0 0.809619238477 371% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 53.3534961887 49.4020404114 108% => OK
Chars per sentence: 109.066666667 106.682146367 102% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.9333333333 20.7667163134 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.06666666667 7.06120827912 72% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.154380581206 0.244688304435 63% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0524970132328 0.084324248473 62% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0374025888886 0.0667982634062 56% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0987044448926 0.151304729494 65% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0206264915217 0.056905535591 36% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.3 13.0946893788 109% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.73 50.2224549098 87% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.45 12.4159519038 116% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.7 8.58950901804 113% => OK
difficult_words: 97.0 78.4519038076 124% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.