Nowadays, online learning are more and more common in tertiary education. From my perspective, this phenomenon has both negative and positive movements.
On the one hand, offering online courses at university has been beneficial in several ways. Firstly, students can create a comfortable learning environment. When people participate in online courses, they may choose places where they want. This can bring learners a sense of receptive knowledge. In the case of the library, for example, is a tranquil place and spire for learners. Secondly, this trend can save much money and time because of the flexible schedule. Instead of taking a little time to sit on the motorbike, students can relax and entertain themselves before having other lectures. Furthermore, thanks to relaxing, pupils can reduce their pressure a lot.
On the other hand, online courses are a poor substitute for traditional education at university. The first rationale is that students are not supervised by teachers so they can lose concentration on lessons easily. Then, lots of undisciplined learners get bad marks. For instance, after covid19 epidemic, the average score in all subjects was seen a dramatic decrease in Viet Nam students. Another negative development is that using smart devices frequently can cause a bad habit because learners spend most of their time sticking their eyes on the screen all day and become addicted. Moreover, students do not want to communicate with other and become isolated and anti-social. For example, the figure for autistic children grows by more than 10% in America.
In conclusion, online courses bring positive in a number of ways. However, their drawbacks in terms of fall learning outcomes should be accounted for.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, firstly, furthermore, however, may, moreover, second, secondly, so, then, for example, for instance, in conclusion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 14.0 24.0651302605 58% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 41.998997996 81% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1464.0 1615.20841683 91% => OK
No of words: 275.0 315.596192385 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.32363636364 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.07223819929 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.82839439895 2.80592935109 101% => OK
Unique words: 173.0 176.041082164 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.629090909091 0.561755894193 112% => OK
syllable_count: 466.2 506.74238477 92% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 16.0721442886 118% => OK
Sentence length: 14.0 20.2975951904 69% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 31.8740596515 49.4020404114 65% => OK
Chars per sentence: 77.0526315789 106.682146367 72% => OK
Words per sentence: 14.4736842105 20.7667163134 70% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.36842105263 7.06120827912 104% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.26306078432 0.244688304435 108% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0692140360448 0.084324248473 82% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.057424685189 0.0667982634062 86% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.148606216116 0.151304729494 98% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.034792118954 0.056905535591 61% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.9 13.0946893788 83% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 48.81 50.2224549098 97% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.3001002004 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.98 12.4159519038 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.92 8.58950901804 104% => OK
difficult_words: 80.0 78.4519038076 102% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 5.0 9.78957915832 51% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 7.6 10.1190380762 75% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.